High-throughput quantification of emerging “nitazene” benzimidazole opioid analogs by microextraction and UHPLC–MS-MS
Open accessAbstract
Benzimidazole opioids, often referred to as nitazenes, represent a subgroup of new psychoactive substances with a recent increase in fatal overdoses in the USA and Europe. With a variety of analogs emerging on the illicit drug market, forensic laboratories are challenged to identify these potent drugs. We here present a simple quantitative approach for the determination of nine nitazene analogs, namely, clonitazene, etodesnitazene, etonitazene, etonitazepyne, flunitazene, isotonitazene, metodesnitazene, metonitazene and protonitazene in whole blood using liquid-phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction in a 96-well format and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Green and efficient sample preparation was accomplished by liquid-phase microextraction in a 96-well format and resulted in high extraction yields for all analytes (>81%). Here, blood diluted with buffer (1:1, %v) was extracted from a donor compartment across a thin organic liquid membrane and into an aqueous acceptor solution. The acceptor solution was collected and directly injected into the analysis platform. Chromatographic separation was accomplished with a biphenyl column, allowing for a baseline separation of the structural isomers isotonitazene and protonitazene before detection by multiple reaction monitoring. Validation was performed according to Scientific Working Group of Forensic Toxicology guidelines. The calibration range was from 0.5 to 50 nM (except for protonitazene and clonitazene from 0.1 nM) with good linearity and limits of detection down to 0.01 nM. An AGREEprep assessment was performed to evaluate sample preparation greenness, with a final score of 0.71. Nitazenes represent a current threat to public health, and analytical methods that cover a wide range of these analogs are limited. Here, the described method may assist in the detection of nitazenes in whole blood and prevent these substances from being missed in postmortem investigations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based techniques, such as liquid chromatography-triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, have become the preferred approaches for screening and quantification in forensic and toxicological laboratories.
“Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based techniques, such as liquid chromatography–triple-quadrupole mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry, have become the preferred approaches for screening and quantification in forensic and toxicological laboratories.”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThese advanced LC-MS systems can achieve the low limits of detection and quantification required for nitazenes.
“These advanced systems can achieve the low limits of detection and quantification required.”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
High-resolution mass spectrometry is particularly valuable for non-targeted screening and structural elucidation of new nitazene analogues.
“High-resolution mass spectrometry is particularly valuable for non-targeted screening and structural elucidation of new analogues [52,53,54,55,56].”
From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [56]
The Experimental procedures (UHPLC–MS-MS; page unavailable) describe targeted multiple-reaction monitoring on a triple-quadrupole instrument. The Conclusion (page unavailable) concerns quantification of nine specified nitazenes. Searches for high-resolution mass spectrometry, non-targeted screening, and structural elucidation found no passage assessing the claimed value of high-resolution mass spectrometry. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Rezaee, M., Assadi, Y., Milani Hosseini, M.-R., Aghaee, E., Ahmadi, F., & Berijani, S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.007 · Cited by 3,402 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Liquid-phase microextraction is one such technique and is found in three main variations, namely, single-drop microextraction (22), dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (23) and hollow-fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) (24).”
MethodDARK Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Etonitazene and Related Benzimidazoles
Ujváry, I., Christie, R., Evans-Brown, M., Gallegos, A., Jorge, R., de Morais, J., & Sedefov, R. (2021) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00037 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Montanari, E., Madeo, G., Pichini, S., Busardò, F. P., & Carlier, J. (2022) · Therapeutic Drug Monitoring · doi:10.1097/ftd.0000000000000970 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Vandeputte, M. M., Krotulski, A. J., Walther, D., Glatfelter, G. C., Papsun, D., Walton, S. E., Logan, B. K., Baumann, M. H., & Stove, C. P. (2022) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-022-03276-4 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- [2]Papsun D.M., Krotulski A.J., Logan B.K. (2022) Proliferation of novel synthetic opioids in postmortem investigations after core-structure scheduling for fentanyl-related substances. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 43, 315– 327. 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000787 36103391 · DOI · Paper page
- [5]Hunger A., Kebrle J., Rossi A., Hoffmann K. (1960) Benzimidazol-derivate und verwandte hetezrocyclen III. Synthese von 1-Aminoalkyl-2-nenzyl-nitro-benzimidazolen. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 43, 1032– 1046. 10.1002/hlca.19600430412 · DOI
- [7]Gross F., Turrian H. (1957) Über Benzimidazolderivate mit starker analgetischer Wirkung. Experientia, 13, 401– 403. 10.1007/BF02161117 13473818 · DOI
- [15]Walton S.E., Krotulski A.J., Logan B.K. (2022) A forward-thinking approach to addressing the new synthetic opioid 2-benzylbenzimidazole nitazene analogs by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Quadrupole Mass Spectrometry (LC–QQQ-MS). Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 46, 221– 231. 10.1093/jat/bkab117 34792157 PMC8935987 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Krotulski A.J., Papsun D.M., Kacinko S.L., Logan B.K. (2020) Isotonitazene quantitation and metabolite discovery in authentic forensic casework. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 44, 521– 530. 10.1093/jat/bkaa016 32091095 · DOI · Paper page
- [17]Armenta S., Garrigues S., de la Guardia M. (2015) The role of green extraction techniques in green analytical chemistry. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 71, 2– 8. 10.1016/j.trac.2014.12.011 · DOI · Paper page
- [18]Pego A.M.F., Roveri F.L., Kuninari R.Y., Leyton V., Miziara I.D., Yonamine M. (2017) Determination of cocaine and its derivatives in hair samples by liquid phase microextraction (LPME) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Forensic Science International, 274, 83– 90. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.024 28063635 · DOI
- [19]Sharifi V., Abbasi A., Nosrati A. (2016) Application of hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction techniques in analytical toxicology. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 24, 264– 276. 10.1016/j.jfda.2015.10.004 28911578 PMC9339569 · DOI
- [20]Manousi N., Samanidou V. (2021) Green sample preparation of alternative biosamples in forensic toxicology. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 20, 100388. 10.1016/j.scp.2021.100388 · DOI
- [21]Ares A.M., Fernández P., Regenjo M., Fernández A.M., Carro A.M., Lorenzo R.A. (2017) A fast bioanalytical method based on microextraction by packed sorbent and UPLC–MS/MS for determining new psychoactive substances in oral fluid. Talanta, 174, 454– 461. 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.06.022 28738608 · DOI
- [22]Liu H., Dasgupta P.K. (1996) Analytical chemistry in a drop. Solvent extraction in a microdrop. Analytical Chemistry, 68, 1817– 1821. 10.1021/ac960145h 21619093 · DOI
- [24]Pedersen-Bjergaard S., Rasmussen K.E. (1999) Liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction for sample preparation of biological fluids prior to capillary electrophoresis. Analytical Chemistry, 71, 2650– 2656. 10.1021/ac990055n 10424162 · DOI · Paper page
- [25]Schüller M., McQuade T.A.-P., Bergh M.-S.-S., Pedersen-Bjergaard S., Øiestad E.L. (2023) Determination of tryptamine analogs in whole blood by 96-well electromembrane extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS. Talanta Open, 7, 100171. 10.1016/j.talo.2022.100171 · DOI
- [26]Gjelstad A., Rasmussen K., Parmer M., Pedersen-Bjergaard S. (2013) Parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction: micro-scale liquid-liquid-liquid extraction in the 96-well format. Bioanalysis, 5, 1377– 1385. 10.4155/bio.13.59 23742307 · DOI
- [27]Skaalvik T.G., Øiestad E.L., Trones R., Pedersen-Bjergaard S., Hegstad S. (2021) Determination of psychoactive drugs in serum using conductive vial electromembrane extraction combined with UHPLC-MS/MS. Journal of Chromatography B, 1183, 122926. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122926 34624684 · DOI
- [28]Hay A.O., Trones R., Herfindal L., Skrede S., Hansen F.A. (2022) Determination of methotrexate and its metabolites in human plasma by electromembrane extraction in conductive vials followed by LC-MS/MS. Advances in Sample Preparation, 2, 100011. 10.1016/j.sampre.2022.100011 · DOI
- [29]Vårdal L., Askildsen H.-M., Gjelstad A., Øiestad E.L., Edvardsen H.M.E., Pedersen-Bjergaard S. (2017) Parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction of new psychoactive substances in plasma and whole blood. Journal of Chromatography B, 1048, 77– 84. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.02.010 28226266 · DOI
- [30]Vårdal L., Wong G., Øiestad Å.M.L., Pedersen-Bjergaard S., Gjelstad A., Øiestad E.L. (2018) Rapid determination of designer benzodiazepines, benzodiazepines, and Z-hypnotics in whole blood using parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 410, 4967– 4978. 10.1007/s00216-018-1147-y 29947895 · DOI
- [31]Ask K.S., Lid M., Øiestad E.L., Pedersen-Bjergaard S., Gjelstad A. (2019) Liquid-phase microextraction in 96-well plates - calibration and accurate quantification of pharmaceuticals in human plasma samples. Journal of Chromatography A, 1602, 117– 123. 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.06.013 31229251 · DOI
- [32]Skottvoll F.S., Hansen F.A., Harrison S., Boger I.S., Mrsa A., Restan M.S., et al. (2021) Electromembrane extraction and mass spectrometry for liver organoid drug metabolism studies. Analytical Chemistry, 93, 3576– 3585. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c05082 33534551 PMC8023518 · DOI
- [33]Restan M.S., Pedersen M.E., Jensen H., Pedersen-Bjergaard S. (2019) Electromembrane extraction of unconjugated fluorescein isothiocyanate from solutions of labeled proteins prior to flow induced dispersion analysis. Analytical Chemistry, 91, 6702– 6708. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00730 31038306 · DOI
- [34]Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology. (2013) Scientific Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX) standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 37, 452– 474. 10.1093/jat/bkt054 23934984 · DOI
- [35]Wojnowski W., Tobiszewski M., Pena-Pereira F., Psillakis E. (2022) AGREEprep – analytical greenness metric for sample preparation. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 149, 116553. 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116553 · DOI · Paper page
- [37]Drouin N., Mandscheff J.-F., Rudaz S., Schappler J. (2017) Development of a new extraction device based on parallel-electromembrane extraction. Analytical Chemistry, 89, 6346– 6350. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01284 28505432 · DOI
- [39]Gałuszka A., Migaszewski Z.M., Konieczka P., Namieśnik J. (2012) Analytical Eco-Scale for assessing the greenness of analytical procedures. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 37, 61– 72. 10.1016/j.trac.2012.03.013 · DOI · Paper page
- [40]Płotka-Wasylka J. (2018) A new tool for the evaluation of the analytical procedure: Green Analytical Procedure Index. Talanta, 181, 204– 209. 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.01.013 29426502 · DOI · Paper page
- [41]Pena-Pereira F., Wojnowski W., Tobiszewski M. (2020) AGREE—analytical GREEnness metric approach and software. Analytical Chemistry, 92, 10076– 10082. 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01887 32538619 PMC7588019 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vandeputte, M. M., & Stove, C. P. (2025) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2025.110470 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Ververi, C., Galletto, M., Massano, M., Alladio, E., Vincenti, M., & Salomone, A. (2024) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2024.115975 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Ameline, A., Gheddar, L., Pichini, S., Stove, C., Aknouche, F., Maruejouls, C., Raul, J.-S., & Kintz, P. (2024) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.119764 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The emergence of nitazenes: a new chapter in the synthetic opioid crisis
Caprari, C., Ferri, E., Rossetti, P., Gregori, A., Citti, C., & Cannazza, G. (2025) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-025-04102-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat
Pereira, J. R. P., Quintas, A., & Neng, N. R. (2025) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules30193890 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“High-resolution mass spectrometry is particularly valuable for non-targeted screening and structural elucidation of new analogues [52–56].”
Gao, G., Yang, S., Wang, X., Xiang, P., Ma, L., Yan, F., & Shi, Y. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2025.116707 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Hollerbach, A. L., Lin, V. S., Ibrahim, Y. M., Ewing, R. G., Metz, T. O., & Rodda, K. E. (2024) · Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1021/jasms.4c00200 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Testing for Protonitazene in Human Hair Using LC–MS-MS
Kintz, P., Ameline, A., Gheddar, L., Pichini, S., Mazoyer, C., Teston, K., Aknouche, F., & Maruejouls, C. (2024) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/jat/bkae050 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Wachełko, O., Tusiewicz, K., Szpot, P., & Zawadzki, M. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2025.116796 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Magny, R., Schiestel, T., M’Rad, A., Lefrère, B., Raphalen, J.-H., Ledochowski, S., Labat, L., Mégarbane, B., & Houzé, P. (2025) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo15060371 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Future of Deadly Synthetic Opioids: Nitazenes and Their International Control
Lassi, N., & Jiang, S. (2025) · Global Policy · doi:10.1111/1758-5899.70000 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Verbeek, J., & Brinkman, D. J. (2025) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/bcpt.70078 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Nalakath, J., Palathinkal, A. B., Naduvilakkandy, R., Vazhat, R. A., & Komathu, P. O. (2025) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.10111 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schüller, M., Lucic, I., Øiestad, Å. M. L., Pedersen-Bjergaard, S., & Øiestad, E. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo , P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, Oslo 0316, Norway
- Corresponding author
- Øiestad, Elisabeth Leere
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-09-13
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 787-796
- ISSN
- 0146-4760 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-2403
- PMC
- PMC10714918
- OpenAlex
- W4386694521
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10
- FWCI
- 6.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Keywords
- nitazenes, new psychoactive substances, liquid-phase microextraction, electromembrane extraction, whole blood analysis, forensic toxicology, etonitazene, isotonitazene, structural isomers, postmortem drug detection, green sample preparation, AGREEprep
- MeSH terms
- Analgesics, Opioid, Benzimidazoles, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Illicit Drugs, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review