Cited by 54Immune Response and InflammationInvertebrate Immune Response MechanismsInflammasome and immune disorders

Intracellular recognition of pathogens and autophagy as an innate immune host defence

Open access
Yano, T., Kurata, S.·2011·Journal of Biochemistry

Abstract

Pathogen recognition is the first and crucial step in innate immunity. Molecular families involved in the recognition of pathogens and activation of the innate immune responses in immunoreactive cells include the Toll-like receptor family in mammals and the peptidoglycan recognition protein (PGRP) family in Drosophila, which sense microorganisms in an extracellular or luminal compartment. Other emerging families are the intracellular recognition molecules for bacteria, such as nucleotide binding and oligomerization domain-like receptors in mammals and PGRP--LE in Drosophila, several of which have been shown to detect structures of bacterial peptidoglycan in the host cell cytosol. Exciting advances in recent studies on autophagy indicate that macroautophagy (referred to here as autophagy) is selectively induced by intracellular recognition molecules and has a crucial role in the elimination of intracellular pathogens, including bacteria, viruses and parasites. This review discusses recent studies related to intracellular recognition molecules and innate immune responses to intracellular pathogens, and highlights the role of autophagy in innate immunity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jb/mvr083

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The autophagic machinery following pathogen entry into cells can target either bacteria-containing phagosomes or free cytosolic bacteria.

    “The autophagic machinery following the entry of the pathogen into cells can target either bacteria-containing phagosomes, or free cytosolic bacteria [8,9,10,11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yano, T., & Kurata, S.
Affiliations
Tohoku University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Biochemistry
Published
2011-07-05
Volume
150
Issue
2
Pages
143-149
ISSN
0021-924X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966342688
Cited by
54
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI07495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Inflammasome and immune disorders
Keywords
autophagy, innate immunity, peptidoglycan recognition proteins, NOD-like receptors, Toll-like receptors, peptidoglycan sensing, selective autophagy, intracellular bacteria
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Carrier Proteins, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Inflammation, Insecta, Virus Physiological Phenomena, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Toll-Like Receptors, Nod Signaling Adaptor Proteins, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review