Cited by 21Celiac Disease Research and ManagementChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEosinophilic Esophagitis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Gluten Free Diet: Assessing Adherence in a Pediatric Celiac Disease Population

Open access
Dowhaniuk, Jenna K, Mileski, Heather, Saab, Joanne, Tutelman, Perri, Thabane, Lehana, Brill, Herbert·2020·Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background: A strict, lifelong, gluten-free diet (GFD) remains the sole treatment for celiac disease (CD). The assessment of adherence to the GFD in pediatric studies is often based on self-report and visual analogue scales which lack proven validity. We sought to compare parental-report of GFD adherence to expert registered dietitian (RD) assessments, the best available standard. Methods: Parents of children with biopsy-proven CD scored their adherence to the GFD on a five-point Likert scale similar to that used in previous pediatric CD studies. Each family was then evaluated by an RD expert in CD management who conducted a comprehensive and standardized assessment and scored the family’s adherence. The agreement between parents and the RD was assessed using paired t test and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) based on their scores. Results: One hundred twenty-two children and their families participated in the study, with a median of 32 months on a GFD. Excellent adherence (score 5 out of 5) was attributed to 60.5% of the sample by the RD. The parents scored adherence higher than the RD by an average difference of 0.41 scale points (95% CI, 0.28–0.54; P < 0.001). The agreement between parents and the registered dietitian was poor (ICC = 0.21). Conclusion: Reliance on self-report through Likert scales for GFD adherence overestimates adherence and misses opportunities for patient and family education. Approximately 40% of children with CD have ongoing gluten exposure, highlighting the need for regular assessment by an RD expert in the GFD to identify education and counselling needs for children with CD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jcag/gwy067

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Hill, 2005, Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children: Recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 40, 1, 10.1097/00005176-200501000-00001 · DOI
  2. Marsh, 1995, The natural history of gluten sensitivity: Defining, refining and re-defining, QJM, 88, 9
  3. Oberhuber, 1999, The histopathology of coeliac disease: Time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists, Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11, 1185, 10.1097/00042737-199910000-00019 · DOI
  4. Hoffenberg, 2003, A prospective study of the incidence of childhood celiac disease, J Pediatr, 143, 308, 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00282-8 · DOI
  5. Rashid, 2005, Celiac disease: Evaluation of the diagnosis and dietary compliance in Canadian children, Pediatrics, 116, e754, 10.1542/peds.2005-0904 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Wagner, 2008, Quality of life in adolescents with treated coeliac disease: Influence of compliance and age at diagnosis, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 47, 555, 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31817fcb56 · DOI
  7. Whitaker, 2009, Patient perceptions of the burden of coeliac disease and its treatment in the UK, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 29, 1131, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03983.x · DOI
  8. Leffler, 2007, A prospective comparative study of five measures of gluten-free diet adherence in adults with coeliac disease, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 26, 1227, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03501.x · DOI
  9. Hommel, 2008, Treatment regimen adherence in pediatric gastroenterology, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 47, 526, 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318175dda1 · DOI
  10. Leonard, 2017, Value of IgA tTG in predicting mucosal recovery in children with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet, J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr, 64, 286, 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001460 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hall, 2009, Systematic review: Adherence to a gluten-free diet in adult patients with coeliac disease, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 30, 315, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04053.x · DOI
  12. Isaac, 2016, Managing the pediatric patient with celiac disease: A multidisciplinary approach, J Multidiscip Healthc, 9, 529, 10.2147/JMDH.S95323 · DOI
  13. 2005, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28–30, 2004, Gastroenterology, 128, S1, 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.007 · DOI
  14. Rajani, 2013, Patient and parent satisfaction with a dietitian- and nurse-led celiac disease clinic for children at the Stollery Children’s Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Can J Gastroenterol, 27, 463, 10.1155/2013/537160 · DOI
  15. Högberg, 2003, Better dietary compliance in patients with coeliac disease diagnosed in early childhood, Scand J Gastroenterol, 38, 751, 10.1080/00365520310003318 · DOI
  16. Butterworth, 2004, Factors relating to compliance with a gluten-free diet in patients with coeliac disease: Comparison of white Caucasian and South Asian patients, Clin Nutr, 23, 1127, 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.02.009 · DOI
  17. Casellas, 2006, Current epidemiology and accessibility to diet compliance in adult celiac disease, Rev Esp Enferm Dig, 98, 408, 10.4321/S1130-01082006000600002 · DOI
  18. Bridge, 1999, Increasing physicians’ awareness of the impact of statistics on research outcomes: Comparative power of the t test and and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test in small samples applied research, J Clin Epidemiol, 52, 229, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00168-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Dowhaniuk, J. K., Mileski, H., Saab, J., Tutelman, P., Thabane, L., & Brill, H.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • McMaster Children's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Brill, Herbert
Venue
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 2515-2084 (ISSN-L)
  • 2515-2092
OpenAlex
W2903740955
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Regional Medical Associates of Hamilton
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, gluten-free diet, dietary adherence, pediatric celiac disease, parent self-report, gluten exposure, family education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review