In Times of Trouble: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Responses to Threats
Open accessAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and the accompanying economic downturn have dramatically impacted the lives of consumers around the world. From a conceptual perspective, such health and economic threats can severely disrupt consumers’ sense of ontological security and elicit adaptive responses by both consumers and marketers. Given the opportune timing, this issue of the Journal of Consumer Research is focused on articles that address questions of consumers’ responses to external threats. The purpose of this introduction is to provide an organizing “conceptual tapestry” to connect the articles appearing in the issue. This framework is provided as a tool to help researchers structure their particular projects within the broader landscape of consumer threat response and to present some potential directions for future research. In conjunction with these articles, we hope that this conceptual framework will provide a point of departure for researchers seeking to enhance the understanding of how consumers and markets collectively respond over the short term and long term to threats that disrupt consumers’ routines, lives, or even the fabric of society.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals have to invest significant emotional resources in reestablishing the balance of psychological resource stock when ontological security is disturbed.
“individuals have to invest significant emotional resources in reestablishing the balance of psychological resource stock when ontological security is disturbed (Campbell et al., 2020).”
From Perceived Destination Restorative Qualities in Wellness Tourism: The Role of Ontological Security and Psychological Resilience (2025) · cites this paper as Campbell et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 257
- Authors
- Campbell, M. C., Inman, J. J., Kirmani, A., & Price, L. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- Campbell, Margaret C
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-07-09
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-326
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- PMC
- PMC7454649
- OpenAlex
- W3040798542
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 34.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
- Keywords
- ontological security, COVID-19 pandemic, economic downturn, consumer adaptation, consumer behavior, conceptual framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review