The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.)
Open accessAbstract
Plants of chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. ILC1919) inoculated with Mesorhizobium ciceri strain ch-191 were grown in a controlled environmental chamber, and were administered salt (0, 50, 75, and 100 mM NaCl) during the vegetative period. Four harvests (4, 7, 11, and 14 d after treatment) were analysed. The aim was to ascertain whether the negative effect of saline stress on nitrogen fixation is due to a limitation on the photosynthate supply to the nodule or a limitation on the nodular metabolism which sustains nitrogenase activity. Plant growth was affected only by the highest NaCl concentration, whereas nitrogenase activity was affected from 50 mM. At the first harvest, Rubisco, PEPC and MDH activities in leaves rose with salt, but fell during the following harvests. The increase of PEPC and MDH in nodules at the two first samplings was clearly related to salt concentration. While 50 mM NaCl increased GS and GOGAT in nodules at some harvests, 100 mM strongly inhibited these activities at all the harvests. The accumulation of proline, amino acids and carbohydrates was clearly related to salt especially in the leaves, whereas in the nodules the protein content was boosted by salt. Although photosynthesis declined with NaCl, the response of nitrogen fixation to salt was more pronounced. This situation, together with carbohydrate accumulation, suggests that the lack of photosynthate does not cause the inhibition of nitrogenase activity under this type of stress. The similar trend observed for the PEPC-MDH pathway and the ARA support the hypothesis concerning the limitation in the supply of energy substrate, mainly malate, to the bacteroids. The accumulation of compatible sol utes is more a consequence of damage produced by salt stress than of a protective strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review
Parida, A. K., & Das, A. B. (2005) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010 · Cited by 4,160
Rady, M. M. (2011) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.035 · Cited by 377
Nxele, X., Klein, A., & Ndimba, B. K. (2017) · South African Journal of Botany · doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2016.11.003 · Cited by 371
Alfalfa plant-derived biostimulant stimulate short-term growth of salt stressed Zea mays L. plants
Ertani, A., Schiavon, M., Muscolo, A., & Nardi, S. (2013) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-012-1335-z · Cited by 317
Variation in Rubisco content and activity under variable climatic factors.
Galmés, J., Aranjuelo, I., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2013) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-013-9861-y · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Soussi, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 325
- Pages
- 1329-1337
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2135201542
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/49.325.1329
- The paper
- Soussi, M. (1998). Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen fixation in chick-pea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/49.325.1329
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.