Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 640

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit

Steudle, Ernst·2000·Journal of Experimental Botany

Abstract

The variable hydraulic conductivity of roots (Lp(r)) is explained in terms of a composite transport model. It is shown how the complex, composite anatomical structure of roots results in a composite transport of both water and solutes. In the model, the parallel apoplastic and cell-to-cell (symplastic and transcellular) pathways play an important role as well as the different tissues and structures arranged in series within the root cylinder (epidermis, exodermis, cortex, endodermis, stelar parenchyma). The roles of Casparian bands and suberin lamellae in the root's endo- and exodermis are discussed. Depending on the developmental state of these apoplastic barriers, the overall hydraulic resistance of roots is either more evenly distributed across the root cylinder (young unstressed roots) or is concentrated in certain layers (exo- and endodermis in older stressed roots). The reason for the variability of root Lp(r), is that hydraulic forces cause a dominating apoplastic flow of water around protoplasts, even in the endodermis and exodermis. In the absence of transpiration, water flow is osmotic in nature which causes a high resistance as water passes across many membranes on its passage across the root cylinder. The model allows for a high capability of roots to take up water in the presence of high rates of transpiration (high demands for water from the shoot). By contrast, the hydraulic conductance is low, when transpiration is switched off. Overall, this results in a non-linear relationship between water flow and forces (gradients of hydrostatic and osmotic pressure) which is otherwise hard to explain. The model allows for special root characteristics such as a high hydraulic conductivity (water permeability) in the presence of a low permeability of nutrient ions once taken up into the stele by active processes. Low root reflection coefficients are in line with the idea of some apoplastic bypasses for water within the root cylinder. According to the composite transport model, the switch from the hydraulic to the osmotic mode is purely physical. In the presence of heavily suberized roots, the apoplastic component of water flow may be too small. Under these conditions, a regulation of radial water flow by water channels dominates. Since water channels are under metabolic control, this component represents an 'active' element of regulation. Composite transport allows for an optimization of the water balance of the shoot in addition to the well-known phenomena involved in the regulation of water flow (gas exchange) across stomata. The model is employed to explain the responses of plants to water deficit and other stresses. During water deficit, the cohesion-tension mechanism of the ascent of sap in the xylem plays an important role. Results are summarized which prove the validity of the coehesion/tension theory. Effects of the stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) are presented. They show that there is an apoplastic component of the flow of ABA in the root which contributes to the ABA signal in the xylem. On the other hand, (+)-cis-trans-ABA specifically affects both the cell level (water channel activity) and water flow driven by gradients in osmotic pressure at the root level which is in agreement with the composite transport model. Hydraulic water flow in the presence of gradients in hydrostatic pressure remains unchanged. The results agree with the composite transport model and resemble earlier findings of high salinity obtained for the cell (Lp) and root (Lp(r)) level. They are in line with known effects of nutrient deprivation on root Lp(r )and the diurnal rhythm of root Lp(r )recently found in roots of LOTUS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1531

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 640

Metadata

Authors
Steudle, E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Published
2000-09
Volume
51
Issue
350
Pages
1531-1542
ISSN
  • 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2431
OpenAlex
W2159355356
Cited by
640
References
37
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1531
The paper
Steudle, E. (2000). Water uptake by roots: effects of water deficit. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1531

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.