The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Steps towards an integrated view of nitrogen metabolism
Open accessAbstract
This article discusses how nitrate assimilation is integrated with nitrate uptake, with ammonium assimilation and amino acid synthesis, with pH regulation, and with the sugar supply in tobacco leaves. During the first part of the light period, nitrate assimilation exceeds nitrate uptake by 2-fold and ammonium assimilation by 50%, leading to rapid depletion of nitrate and accumulation of ammonium, glutamine, glycine and serine. NIA, NII and PPC expression show a shared maximum early in the diurnal cycle to direct carbon towards malate synthesis for pH regulation. Later in the diurnal cycle an orchestrated increase of GLN2, PKc, CS, and ICDH-1 expression re-establishes a balance between nitrate assimilation and ammonium metabolism. Nitrate uptake continues throughout the night, replenishing the leaf nitrate pool. These diurnal changes are attenuated or abolished in mutants with low NIA activity, and modified in wild-type plants growing on different nitrogen sources or elevated [CO(2)]. Comparison across genotypes and conditions reveals that NIA transcript levels are always closely related to the balance between nitrate influx and assimilation, but are unrelated to changes of glutamine or 2-oxoglutarate. In a systematic search for other downstream regulators, a wide range of downstream metabolites was fed to detached leaves and glutamate, cysteine, asparagine, and malate identified as candidates. Low sugars totally inhibit nitrate assimilation, overriding signals from nitrogen metabolism. Moderate changes act post-transcriptionally, and larger changes lead to a collapse of the NIA transcript. Low sugars also lead to a collapse of minor amino acids and a dramatic decrease of phenylpropanoids and nicotine. Consequently, wild-type plants growing in unfavourable light regimes and antisense RBCS transformants are simultaneously carbon- and nitrogen-limited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Self-citation
Cited by
Miflin, B. J., & Habash, D. Z. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.370.979 · Cited by 746
Genomic Analysis of the Nitrate Response Using a Nitrate Reductase-Null Mutant of Arabidopsis
Wang, R., Tischner, R., Gutiérrez, R. A., Hoffman, M., Xing, X., Chen, M., Coruzzi, G., & Crawford, N. M. (2004) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.044610 · Cited by 448
Ammonium Utilization in Microalgae: A Sustainable Method for Wastewater Treatment
Salbitani, G., & Carfagna, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020956 · Cited by 245
Gorfer, M., Blumhoff, M., Klaubauf, S., Urban, A., Inselsbacher, E., Bandian, D., Mitter, B., Sessitsch, A., Wanek, W., & Strauss, J. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.53 · Cited by 78
BUCKLEY, T. N., & ADAMS, M. A. (2011) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02228.x · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Stitt, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-04-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 370
- Pages
- 959-970
- ISSN
- 0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2431
- OpenAlex
- W2152360790
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Steps towards an integrated view of nitrogen metabolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jexbot/53.370.959
- The paper
- Stitt, M. (2002). Steps towards an integrated view of nitrogen metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.370.959
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.