Cited by 24Healthcare Systems and ReformsHealthcare Systems and PracticesEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Individual Responsibility and Solidarity in European Health Care: Further Down the Road to Two-Tier System of Health Care

Ter Meulen, R., Jotterand, F.·2008·Journal of Medicine and Philosophy

Abstract

European health care systems are in process of profound reconstruction. In many countries, one can notice various attempts to reduce the package of public services and to increase the private contributions of beneficiaries. This development is often considered as retreat of the concept of solidarity, which meant both a benevolent attitude toward weaker groups in society and a commitment to fair or even egalitarian distribution of health care services (Houtepen and ter Meulen, 2000). The concept of solidarity provided for a long time the ideological rationale for the transfer of financial contributions by individuals by way of compulsory health insurance schemes or national taxation to a universal health care system that should guarantee equal access to health care for those who are in need. The concept of solidarity was rooted firmly in European culture reflecting a mixture of various philosophical, religious, and cultural traditions, particularly Christian social ethics and social democratic ideology. It meant a strong responsibility of society for the needs of the individual in relation to health and welfare.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jmp/jhn012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ter Meulen, R., & Jotterand, F.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
Venue
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
Published
2008-06-01
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
191-197
ISSN
  • 0360-5310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5019
OpenAlex
W2109638860
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
personal responsibility, solidarity, European health systems, two-tier health care system, health care reform, universal health care, statutory health insurance, health care financing, social ethics, social democracy, Christian social ethics
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Europe, Health Policy, Humans, Philosophy, Medical, Social Justice, State Medicine, Health Care Reform, Personhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review