Individual Responsibility and Solidarity in European Health Care: Further Down the Road to Two-Tier System of Health Care
Abstract
European health care systems are in process of profound reconstruction. In many countries, one can notice various attempts to reduce the package of public services and to increase the private contributions of beneficiaries. This development is often considered as retreat of the concept of solidarity, which meant both a benevolent attitude toward weaker groups in society and a commitment to fair or even egalitarian distribution of health care services (Houtepen and ter Meulen, 2000). The concept of solidarity provided for a long time the ideological rationale for the transfer of financial contributions by individuals by way of compulsory health insurance schemes or national taxation to a universal health care system that should guarantee equal access to health care for those who are in need. The concept of solidarity was rooted firmly in European culture reflecting a mixture of various philosophical, religious, and cultural traditions, particularly Christian social ethics and social democratic ideology. It meant a strong responsibility of society for the needs of the individual in relation to health and welfare.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PHC and self-tracking for health echo the discourse of individual responsibility that has become pervasive in government policy on healthcare in the United States and Europe in recent decades.
“PHC and self-tracking for health echo the discourse of individual responsibility that has become pervasive in government policy on healthcare in the United States and in Europe in recent decades.”
From Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare (2017) · cites this paper as ter Meulen and Jotterand 2008
Cites
New Types of Solidarity in the European Welfare State
Houtepen, R., & ter Meulen, R. (2000) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1023/a:1026530912872 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Consumer Choice in Dutch Health Insurance after Reform
Maarse, H., & ter Meulen, R. (2006) · Health Care Analysis · doi:10.1007/s10728-006-0010-z · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sharon, T. (2017) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ter Meulen, R., & Jotterand, F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- ORCID
- Jotterand, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 191-197
- ISSN
- 0360-5310 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-5019
- OpenAlex
- W2109638860
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- personal responsibility, solidarity, European health systems, two-tier health care system, health care reform, universal health care, statutory health insurance, health care financing, social ethics, social democracy, Christian social ethics
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Europe, Health Policy, Humans, Philosophy, Medical, Social Justice, State Medicine, Health Care Reform, Personhood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review