The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age Differences in the Impact of Nutritional Supplementation on Growth
Open accessAbstract
Supplementary feeding programs are common in developing countries. These programs often cannot demonstrate an impact on child growth, however, possibly because they tend to reach older children. This study examines the impact of nutritional supplementation on annual growth rates in length and weight from birth to 7 y of age in 1208 rural Guatemalan children. A series of multiple linear regression models is used to control for initial body size, diarrheal disease, home diet, socioeconomic status and gender. During the first year of life, each 100 kcal/d (418 kJ) of supplement was associated with approximately 9 mm in additional length gain and 350 g in additional weight gain; the benefit decreased to approximately 5 mm in length gain and 250 g in weight gain during the 2nd y of life. Between 24 and 36 mo of age, supplement only had a significant impact on length. There was no impact of nutritional supplementation on growth between 3 and 7 y of age. Patterns were the same if supplement intakes were expressed as a percent of recommended allowances or growth was expressed as a percent of the expected rate. These impacts of nutritional supplementation on growth coincide with the ages when growth velocities, as well as growth deficits, are greatest in this population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Incremental growth tables: Supplementary to previously published charts
Baumgartner, R., Roche, A., & Himes, J. (1986) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/43.5.711 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Engle, P. L., Black, M. M., Behrman, J. R., Cabral de Mello, M., Gertler, P. J., Kapiriri, L., Martorell, R., & Young, M. E. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60112-3 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citationFernald, L. C., Gertler, P. J., & Neufeld, L. M. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60382-7 · Cited by 596
Improved nutrition in the first 1000 days and adult human capital and health
Martorell, R. (2017) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.22952 · Cited by 359
Self-citationOh, H., Coburn, S. B., Matthews, C. E., Falk, R. T., LeBlanc, E. S., Wactawski-Wende, J., Sampson, J., Pfeiffer, R. M., Brinton, L. A., Wentzensen, N., et al. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0810-0 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Schroeder, D. G., Martorell, R., Rivera, J. A., Ruel, M. T., & Habicht, J.-P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4 Suppl
- Pages
- 1051S-1059S
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1865565870
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Differences in the Impact of Nutritional Supplementation on Growth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jn/125.suppl_4.1051s
- The paper
- Schroeder, D. G., Martorell, R., Rivera, J. A., Ruel, M. T., & Habicht, J.-P. (1995). Age Differences in the Impact of Nutritional Supplementation on Growth. The Journal of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/125.suppl_4.1051s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.