Cited by 152Trace Elements in HealthChild Nutrition and Water AccessIron Metabolism and Disorders

The Need for Maternal Zinc Supplementation in Developing Countries: An Unresolved Issue

Open access
Osendarp, Saskia J.M., West, Clive E., Black, Robert E.·2003·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Maternal zinc deficiency during pregnancy has been related to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Most studies in which pregnant women have been supplemented with zinc to examine effects on pregnancy outcome have been carried out in industrialized countries and the results have been inconclusive. This review discusses preliminary findings of eight randomized, controlled intervention trials performed recently in less-developed countries. It is based on evidence presented by investigators and discussed during a workshop held in Wageningen, The Netherlands in June 2001. Preliminary findings from these studies indicate maternal zinc supplementation has a beneficial effect on neonatal immune status, early neonatal morbidity and infant infections. With respect to labor and delivery complications, gestational age at birth, maternal zinc status and health and fetal neurobehavioral development, evidence is conflicting and more research is required. Data currently available do not support the hypothesis that maternal zinc supplementation promotes intrauterine growth. Thus despite the emerging evidence for a positive effect of zinc on some outcomes of pregnancy, the workshop concluded that the full results of studies carried out need to be known and that more research is required to determine the benefits of large-scale introduction of zinc supplementation of pregnant women in less-developed countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/133.3.817s

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osendarp, S. J. M., West, C. E., & Black, R. E.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
West, Clive E.
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
133
Issue
3
Pages
817S-827S
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1899550789
Cited by
152
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
Keywords
maternal zinc supplementation, pregnancy outcomes, neonatal morbidity, infant infection, childbirth complications, gestational age at delivery, fetal growth, developing countries, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Female, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Health Status, Humans, Immunity, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Zinc, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nutrition Policy, Dietary Supplements, Fetal Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review