Cited by 112Digital Radiography and Breast ImagingPhytoestrogen effects and researchNutritional Studies and Diet

A 2-year soy intervention in premenopausal women does not change mammographic densities

Open access
Maskarinec, Gertraud, Takata, Yumie, Franke, Adrian A., Williams, Andrew E., Murphy, Suzanne P.·2004·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Soy consumption may be related to lower breast cancer risk as assessed by breast density. The aims of this 2-y trial were to examine the effects of soy foods and lifetime soy intake on mammographic density. After 220 premenopausal women were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, the former group consumed 2 daily servings of soy foods equivalent to 50 mg of isoflavones and the latter consumed their regular diet. The respective dropout rates were 15.6 and 12.6%; adherence to the study regimen was high. We assessed lifetime soy intake with a questionnaire and measured breast density in screening mammograms obtained at baseline and at the end of the trial for 98 intervention and 103 control women using a computer-assisted method. None of the mammographic outcomes differed significantly by experimental group. The total area of the breast increased and the size of the dense areas decreased significantly over time in both groups. After 2 y, the mean percentage density had decreased by 2.8 and 4.1% in intervention and control women, respectively. Women who reported eating more soy during their lives had higher percentage densities than women whose diet included little soy; this difference was significant only in Caucasians. Lower soy intake during early life and higher soy intake during adulthood predicted a greater reduction in the percentage density during the study period. After 2 y of intervention, we observed no significant differences in mammographic densities…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/134.11.3089

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • None of the RCTs assessing endometrial thickness, mammographic density or changes, nipple aspirate volume, PAP results and uterine fibroid growth, or vaginal cytology found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to control.

    “None of the studies assessing endometrial thickness [132,136,155], mammographic density or mammographic changes [66,132,136,137,144,146], nipple aspirate volume [134], PAP results and uterine fibroid growth [132], or vaginal cytology [155] found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to the control group.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maskarinec, G., Takata, Y., Franke, A. A., Williams, A. E., & Murphy, S. P.
Corresponding author
Maskarinec, Gertraud
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
134
Issue
11
Pages
3089-3094
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096219527
Cited by
112
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA080843)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
soy products, isoflavones, breast density, breast cancer risk, premenopausal women, dietary intervention, breast size, ethnic differences, mammography screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Mammography, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Mass Index, Premenopause, Soy Foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review