A 2-year soy intervention in premenopausal women does not change mammographic densities
Open accessAbstract
Soy consumption may be related to lower breast cancer risk as assessed by breast density. The aims of this 2-y trial were to examine the effects of soy foods and lifetime soy intake on mammographic density. After 220 premenopausal women were randomly assigned to the intervention or control group, the former group consumed 2 daily servings of soy foods equivalent to 50 mg of isoflavones and the latter consumed their regular diet. The respective dropout rates were 15.6 and 12.6%; adherence to the study regimen was high. We assessed lifetime soy intake with a questionnaire and measured breast density in screening mammograms obtained at baseline and at the end of the trial for 98 intervention and 103 control women using a computer-assisted method. None of the mammographic outcomes differed significantly by experimental group. The total area of the breast increased and the size of the dense areas decreased significantly over time in both groups. After 2 y, the mean percentage density had decreased by 2.8 and 4.1% in intervention and control women, respectively. Women who reported eating more soy during their lives had higher percentage densities than women whose diet included little soy; this difference was significant only in Caucasians. Lower soy intake during early life and higher soy intake during adulthood predicted a greater reduction in the percentage density during the study period. After 2 y of intervention, we observed no significant differences in mammographic densities…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the RCTs assessing endometrial thickness, mammographic density or changes, nipple aspirate volume, PAP results and uterine fibroid growth, or vaginal cytology found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to control.
“None of the studies assessing endometrial thickness [132,136,155], mammographic density or mammographic changes [66,132,136,137,144,146], nipple aspirate volume [134], PAP results and uterine fibroid growth [132], or vaginal cytology [155] found any evidence of negative impact from soy compared to the control group.”
From Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review (2013) · cites this paper as [144]
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
Soya foods and breast cancer risk: A prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan
Key, T. J., Sharp, G. B., Appleby, P. N., Beral, V, Goodman, M. T., Soda, M., & Mabuchi, K. (1999) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6690837 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Messina, M., & Redmond, G. (2006) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2006.16.249 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Soy, Red Clover, and Isoflavones and Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review
Fritz, H., Seely, D., Flower, G., Skidmore, B., Fernandes, R., Vadeboncoeur, S., Kennedy, D., Cooley, K., Wong, R., Sagar, S., et al. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081968 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Inflammatory markers in a 2-year soy intervention among premenopausal women
Maskarinec, G., Sofias, J. S., Franke, A. A., & Cooney, R. V. (2009) · Journal of Inflammation · doi:10.1186/1476-9255-6-9 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Maskarinec, G., Takata, Y., Franke, A. A., Williams, A. E., & Murphy, S. P.
- Corresponding author
- Maskarinec, Gertraud
- Venue
- The Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3089-3094
- ISSN
- 0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096219527
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA080843)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Phytoestrogen effects and research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Keywords
- soy products, isoflavones, breast density, breast cancer risk, premenopausal women, dietary intervention, breast size, ethnic differences, mammography screening
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Diet, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Isoflavones, Mammography, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Mass Index, Premenopause, Soy Foods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review