Cited by 103Iron Metabolism and DisordersPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsChild Nutrition and Water Access

Cognitive Performance in Indian School-Going Adolescents Is Positively Affected by Consumption of Iron-Biofortified Pearl Millet: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Efficacy Trial

Open access
Scott, Samuel P, Murray-Kolb, Laura E, Wenger, Michael J, Udipi, Shobha A, Ghugre, Padmini S, Boy, Erick, Haas, Jere D·2018·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Background Iron deficiency remains the most prevalent micronutrient deficiency globally, but few studies have examined how iron status relates to cognition in adolescents. Iron biofortification of staple food crops is being scaled up, yet it is unknown whether consuming biofortified crops can benefit cognition.Objective Our objective was to determine the efficacy of iron-biofortified pearl millet in improving attention and memory in Indian school-going adolescents.Methods A double-blind, randomized, intervention study was conducted in 140 Indian boys and girls, aged 12-16 y, who were assigned to consume iron-biofortified [Fe = 86 parts per million (ppm)] or conventional (Fe = 21-52 ppm) pearl millet. Hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin receptor (TfR) were measured and body iron (BI) was calculated at baseline and after 4 and 6 mo. Five measures of cognitive function were obtained at baseline and 6 mo: simple reaction time (SRT), Go/No-Go (GNG) task, Attentional Network Task (ANT), Composite Face Effect (CFE) task, and Cued Recognition Task (CRT). Intention-to-treat analysis was used.Results Daily iron intake from pearl millet was higher in those consuming biofortified compared with conventional pearl millet (19.6 compared with 4.8 mg/d). Effects on ferritin, TfR, and BI at 4 mo, and on TfR at 6 mo (all P < 0.05), indicated efficacy of biofortified pearl millet over conventional pearl millet in improving iron status. Compared with conventional pearl millet, the consumption of biofortified pearl millet resulted in greater improvement in attention (SRT, GNG, and ANT) and memory (CFE and CRT). Reaction time decreased twice as much from 0 to 6 mo in those consuming biofortified compared with conventional pearl millet on attention tasks (SRT: -123 compared with -63 ms; GNG: -67 compared with -30 ms; ANT double cue: -74 compared with -32 ms; all P < 0.01).Conclusion Consuming iron-biofortified pearl millet improves iron status and some measures of cognitive performance in Indian adolescents. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02152150.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/nxy113

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 140 Indian adolescents aged 12-16 years who consumed for 6 months a biofortified iron-rich millet compared with conventional millet, attention and memory performance increased significantly, and ferritin level increased vs placebo (30 vs 22 μg/L).

    “attention and memory performance increased significantly in 140 Indian adolescents aged 12–16 years who consumed for 6 months a biofortified iron-rich millet compared with conventional millet, which increased their ferritin level vs. placebo (30 vs. 22 µg/L) [206].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scott, S. P., Murray-Kolb, L. E., Wenger, M. J., Udipi, S. A., Ghugre, P. S., Boy, E., & Haas, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University (IN)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
148
Issue
9
Pages
1462-1471
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884063131
Cited by
103
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HarvestPlus/International Food Policy Research Institute
  • Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research/Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (2011H8247.COR, 2011H8212.PSU, 2011H8249.SNDT, 2012H8276.UO)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Iron Metabolism and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
iron biofortification, pearl millet, iron deficiency, cognitive performance, attention, memory, adolescents, iron status, ferritin, transferrin receptor, body iron, reaction time, go/no-go task, staple crops, India, school-going children, micronutrient deficiency
MeSH terms
Iron Deficiencies, Adolescent, Attention, Child, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Ferritins, Food, Fortified, Hemoglobins, Humans, India, Iron, Male, Memory, Nutritional Status, Receptors, Transferrin, Students, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Pennisetum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review