The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of Skin Cancer in an Endemic Area of Chronic Arsenicism in Taiwan 2
Abstract
In a limited area on the southwest coast of Taiwan where artesian well water with a high concentration of arsenic has been used for more than 45 years, a high prevalence of chronic arsenic poisoning has been observed in recent years. The total population of this endemic area, which is defined by the presence of both patients and contaminated wells, is approximately 100,000. A general survey of 40,421 inhabitants (19,269 males and 21,152 females) of the area was made. The overall prevalence rates for skin cancer, hyperpigmentation, and keratosis were 10.6, 183.5, and 71.0/1000, respectively. The male-to-female ratio was 2.9: 1 for skin cancer and 1.1: 1 for hyperpigmentation and keratosis, respectively. Generally speaking, the prevalence increased steadily with age in all three conditions, though there was a decline in age groups above 69 in females with cancer or hyperpigmentation. The prevalence rate for skin cancer showed an ascending gradient according to the arsenic content of the well water, i.e., the higher the arsenic content, the more patients with skin cancer. The results were the same for hyperpigmentation and keratosis. Blackfoot disease, so-termed locally, a peripheral vascular disorder resulting in gangrene of the extremities, especially of the feet, had an overall prevalence rate of 8.9/1000. A dose-response relationship between this disease and the amount of arsenic in the well water was similar to that observed for skin cancer. The association of Blackfoot disease with hyperpigmentation, keratosis, and skin cancer was significantly higher than expected. The causal relationship between Blackfoot disease and chronic arsenicism is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters
Smedley, P. L., & Kinniburgh, D. G. (2002) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(02)00018-5 · Cited by 7,691
Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U. (2007) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006 · Cited by 3,536
Arsenic Exposure and Toxicology: A Historical Perspective
Hughes, M. F., Beck, B. D., Chen, Y., Lewis, A. S., & Thomas, D. J. (2011) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr184 · Cited by 1,312
Cancer risks from arsenic in drinking water
Smith, A. H., Hopenhayn-Rich, C., Bates, M. N., Goeden, H. M., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Duggan, H. M., Wood, R., Kosnett, M. J., & Smith, M. T. (1992) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.9297259 · Cited by 1,110
McArthur, J. M., Banerjee, D. M., Hudson-Edwards, K. A., Mishra, R., Purohit, R., Ravenscroft, P., Cronin, A., Howarth, R. J., Chatterjee, A., Talukder, T., et al. (2004) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.02.001 · Cited by 831
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1968-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 453-63
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2128481501
- Cited by
- 787
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Skin Cancer in an Endemic Area of Chronic Arsenicism in Taiwan 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/40.3.453
- The paper
- Prevalence of Skin Cancer in an Endemic Area of Chronic Arsenicism in Taiwan 2. (1968). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/40.3.453
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.