The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rhabdomyosarcoma in Children: Epidemiologic Study and Identification of a Familial Caneer Syndrome
Abstract
To study the origins of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma, an examination was made of the 418 death certificates of U.S. children who died of this neoplasm, 1960–64, and of 280 medical charts from 17 hospital centers. Of exceptional interest was the presence in 5 families of a second child with a soft-tissue sarcoma, 3 sibs (vs. 0.06 expected by chance), and 2 cousins. The parents, grandparents, and other relatives of children in these families had a high frequency of carcinoma of the breast and diverse neoplasms (e.g., acute leukemia and carcinomas of the lung, pancreas, and skin) at relatively young ages, suggesting a new familial syndrome of multiple primary cancers. Additional components of the syndrome were implicated by the occurrence of adrenocortical carcinoma and brain tumor in the first-degree relatives of 2 other children with rhabdomyosarcoma. While suggesting the role of inheritance, the familial patterns seen with rhabdomyosarcoma may result from an interaction of genetic and environmental (?viral) factors. The oncogenic agents and mechanisms in human cancer may be identified by the use of such family aggregations for laboratory studies and further epidemiologic studies. Like most childhood neoplasms, rhabdomyosarcoma showed a peak mortality before 4 years of age and occurred slightly more often in males. This neoplasm was diagnosed in 29 children in the hospital series before 1 year of age and in 9 within 1 month of birth; this indicates that rhabdomyosarcoma may arise in vtero. Unlike most neoplasms of early inception, however, no association with congenital defects was detected. Rhabdomyosarcoma also showed no variations in time and/or space that might reflect environmental influences, such as viral or chemical agents which can induce this neoplasm in laboratory animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mutant p53: one name, many proteins
Freed-Pastor, W. A., & Prives, C. (2012) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.190678.112 · Cited by 1,247
When mutants gain new powers: News from the mutant p53 field
Brosh, R., & Rotter, V. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2693 · Cited by 1,132
Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syndrome
Lang, G. A., Iwakuma, T., Suh, Y.-A., Liu, G., Rao, V. A., Parant, J. M., Valentin-Vega, Y. A., Terzian, T., Caldwell, L. C., Strong, L. C., et al. (2004) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.006 · Cited by 1,069
Rivlin, N., Brosh, R., Oren, M., & Rotter, V. (2011) · Genes & Cancer · doi:10.1177/1947601911408889 · Cited by 1,033
Malkin, D. (2011) · Genes & Cancer · doi:10.1177/1947601911413466 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1969-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1365-73
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2095834651
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhabdomyosarcoma in Children: Epidemiologic Study and Identification of a Familial Caneer Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/43.6.1365
- The paper
- Rhabdomyosarcoma in Children: Epidemiologic Study and Identification of a Familial Caneer Syndrome. (1969). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/43.6.1365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.