Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tumor Angiogenesis: A Quantitative Method for Histologic Grading 2

·1972·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

A quantitative technique for measuring the degree of angiogenesis in tumors is described. The microscopic angiogenesis grading system was based on 3 parameters of endothelial regeneration: vasopro-liferation, endothelial cell hyperplasia, and endothelial cytology, providing a composite rating of 0–100. The method was tested in grading the degree of neovascularization in cerebral neoplasms and vascular tissues induced by tumors and tumor extracts; it appeared to give quantitatively reproducible and biologically reasonable results. Preliminary observations on a variety of other tumors suggest that solid neoplasms can be classified according to the extent of angiogenesis along a spectrum ranging from the “endothelial-poor” tumors, such as the chondrosarcomas, to the “endothelial-rich” tumors, such as glioblastomas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/48.2.347

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1972-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
347-56
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W1917703525
Cited by
414
References
0
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor Angiogenesis: A Quantitative Method for Histologic Grading 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/48.2.347
The paper
Tumor Angiogenesis: A Quantitative Method for Histologic Grading 2. (1972). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/48.2.347

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.