The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organ Selectivity for Implantation Survival and Growth of B16 Melanoma Variant Tumor Lines 2
Abstract
The fate of bloodborne malignant melanoma cells selected for their enhanced ability to form lung colonies was examined to determine how specific tumor cells are arrested in certain organs during the experimental metastasis process. After murine B16 melanoma variant tumor cell lines with low (B16-F1) or high (B16-F10) survival and growth potential in vivo were admisistered by iv or intracardiac injections into syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, the quantitative distribution of [125l]5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine (125IUDR)-labeled cells in the organs and subsequent formation of metastatic lung colonies were assessed. The initial distribution of viable tumor cells was dependent on the route of injection: Soon after iv injection, more 125IUDR-labeled B16 cells were localized in the lungs and fewer in the blood and other organs than after intracardiac injection. However, 1 day after the injection, the number of viable tumor cells in the lungs was independent of the route of injection, and at 14 days the quantity of resulting lung tumor colonies was similar. Variant line B16-F10 cells were better arrested and formed more tumors per input cell than B16-F1, regardless of the injection route. B16-F10 yielded only lung tumor colonies, whereas B16-F1 formed some extrapulmonary tumor growths. The results suggested that the ultimate fate of circulating tumor cells was not determined solely by nonspecific arrest in the capillary bed of the first organ encountered, and that in vivo selection could produce tumor line variants with organs preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET
Peinado, H., Alečković, M., Lavotshkin, S., Matei, I., Costa-Silva, B., Moreno-Bueno, G., Hergueta-Redondo, M., Williams, C., García-Santos, G., Ghajar, C. M., et al. (2012) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2753 · Cited by 3,715
Pre-metastatic niches: organ-specific homes for metastases
Peinado, H., Zhang, H., Matei, I. R., Costa-Silva, B., Hoshino, A., Rodrigues, G., Psaila, B., Kaplan, R. N., Bromberg, J. F., Kang, Y., et al. (2017) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.6 · Cited by 1,889
Glutathione in Cancer Biology and Therapy
Estrela, J. M., Ortega, A., & Obrador, E. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408360500523878 · Cited by 1,041
Biological Diversity in Metastatic Neoplasms: Origins and Implications
Fidler, I. J., & Hart, I. R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7112116 · Cited by 928
Self-citationThe Biology of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis
(1978) · Advances in Cancer Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60648-x · Cited by 801
Metadata
- Authors
- Fidler, I. J., & Nicolson, G. L.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1199-1202
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W1963349315
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organ Selectivity for Implantation Survival and Growth of B16 Melanoma Variant Tumor Lines 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/57.5.1199
- The paper
- Fidler, I. J., & Nicolson, G. L. (1976). Organ Selectivity for Implantation Survival and Growth of B16 Melanoma Variant Tumor Lines 2. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/57.5.1199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.