The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Second Cancers Following Radiation Treatment for Cervical Cancer. An International Collaboration Among Cancer Registries
Abstract
The numbers of second cancers among 182,040 women treated for cervical cancer that were reported to 15 cancer registries in 8 countries were compared to the numbers expected had the same risk prevailed as in the general population. A small 9% excess of second cancers (5,146 observed vs. 4,736 expected) occurred 1 or more years after treatment. Large radiation doses experienced by 82,616 women did not dramatically alter their risk of developing a second cancer; at most, about 162 of 3,324 second cancers (approximately equal to 5%) could be attributed to radiation. The relative risk (RR = 1.1) for developing cancer in organs close to the cervix that had received high radiation exposures--most notably, the bladder, rectum, uterine corpus, ovary, small intestine, bone, and connective tissue--and for developing multiple myeloma increased with time since treatment. No similar increase was seen for 99,424 women not treated with radiation. Only a slight excess of acute and non-lymphocytic leukemia was found among irradiated women (RR = 1.3), and substantially fewer cases were observed than expected on the basis of current radiation risk estimates. The small risk of leukemia may be associated with low doses of radiation absorbed by the bone marrow outside the pelvis, inasmuch as the marrow in the pelvis may have been destroyed or rendered inactive by very large radiotherapy exposures. There was little evidence of a radiation effect for cancers of the stomach, colon, liver, and gallbladder, for melanoma and other skin cancers, or for chronic lymphocytic leukemia despite substantial exposures. An excess of thyroid cancer possibly was related to the low dose received by this organ. Ovarian damage caused by radiation may have been responsible for a low breast cancer risk (RR = 0.7), which was evident even among postmenopausal women. A substantial excess of lung cancer (RR = 3.7) largely may be due to misclassification of metastases and the confounding influence of cigarette smoking. Women who were under 30 or over 50 years of age when irradiated were at greatest absolute risk for developing a second cancer. The RR, however, was higher among those under age 30 years at exposure (RR = 3.9) than among older women. The expression period for radiation-induced solid tumors appeared to continue to the end of life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT
Hall, E. J., & Wuu, C.-S. (2003) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00073-7 · Cited by 1,301
Thyroid Cancer after Exposure to External Radiation: A Pooled Analysis of Seven Studies
Ron, E., Lubin, J. H., Shore, R. E., Mabuchi, K., Modan, B., Pottern, L. M., Schneider, A. B., Tucker, M. A., & Boice, J. D. (2012) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rrav05.1 · Cited by 1,124
de Gonzalez, A. B., Curtis, R. E., Kry, S. F., Gilbert, E., Lamart, S., Berg, C. D., Stovall, M., & Ron, E. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70061-4 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1985-05
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 955-75
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W1956788036
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second Cancers Following Radiation Treatment for Cervical Cancer. An International Collaboration Among Cancer Registries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/74.5.955
- The paper
- Second Cancers Following Radiation Treatment for Cervical Cancer. An International Collaboration Among Cancer Registries. (1985). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/74.5.955
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.