Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Proportion of second cancers attributable to radiotherapy treatment in adults: a cohort study in the US SEER cancer registries

Open access
de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington, Curtis, Rochelle E, Kry, Stephen F, Gilbert, Ethel, Lamart, Stephanie, Berg, Christine D, Stovall, Marilyn, Ron, Elaine·2011·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background As cancer survival improves, the long-term risks from treatments including the risk of developing a second cancer after radiotherapy become more important. The proportion of second cancers that may be related to radiotherapy is unknown. Methods We used the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registries to conduct a systematic analysis of 15 cancer sites that are treated routinely with radiotherapy. Relative risks (RR) for patients receiving radiotherapy versus patients not receiving radiotherapy were estimated using Poisson regression adjusted for age, stage and other potential confounders. Findings The cohort included 647,672 five-year adult survivors followed-up for an average of 7 additional years; 60,271 (9%) developed a second solid cancer. For each of the first cancer sites the RR of developing a second cancer associated with radiotherapy exceeded one, and varied from 1.08 (95%CI:0.79–1.46) after eye/orbit cancers to 1.43 (95%CI:1.13–1.84) after testicular cancer. In general the RR was highest for organs likely to have received >5Gy, decreased with increasing age at diagnosis and increased with time since diagnosis. We estimated a total of 3266 (95%CI:2862–3670) excess second solid cancers that could be related to radiation; 8% (95%CI:7%–9%) of the total in all radiotherapy patients (1+yr survivors) and 5 excess cancers/1,000 patients treated with radiotherapy by 15 years after diagnosis. Approximately half (54%) the excess cancers were in organs likely to have received >5Gy. Interpretation A relatively small proportion of second cancers are related to radiotherapy in adults, suggesting that most are due to other factors, such as lifestyle or genetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70061-4

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
de Gonzalez, A. B., Curtis, R. E., Kry, S. F., Gilbert, E., Lamart, S., Berg, C. D., Stovall, M., & Ron, E.
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
353-360
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140430330
Cited by
481
References
31
FWCI
18.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proportion of second cancers attributable to radiotherapy treatment in adults: a cohort study in the US SEER cancer registries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70061-4
The paper
de Gonzalez, A. B., Curtis, R. E., Kry, S. F., Gilbert, E., Lamart, S., Berg, C. D., Stovall, M., & Ron, E. (2011). Proportion of second cancers attributable to radiotherapy treatment in adults: a cohort study in the US SEER cancer registries. The Lancet Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70061-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.