The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Highly Specific Prediction of Antineoplastic Drug Resistance With an In Vitro Assay Using Suprapharmacologic Drug Exposures
Abstract
Bayes' theorem has been used to describe the relationship between the accuracy of a predictive test (posttest probability) and the overall incidence of what is being tested (pretest probability). Bayes' theorem indicates that laboratory assays will be accurate in the prediction of clinical drug resistance in tumors with high overall response rates (e.g., previously untreated breast cancer) only when the assays are extremely (greater than 98%) specific for drug resistance. We developed a highly specific drug-resistance assay in which human tumor colonies were cultured in soft agar and drugs were tested at high concentrations for long exposure times. Coefficients for concentration x time exceeded those reported in contemporaneous studies by about 100-fold. We reviewed 450 correlations between assay results and clinical response over an 8-year period. Results were analyzed by subsets, including different tumor histologies, single agents, and drug combinations. Extreme drug resistance (an assay result greater than or equal to SD below the median) was identified with greater than 99% specificity. Only one of 127 patients with tumors showing extreme drug resistance responded to chemotherapy. This negligible posttest probability of response was independent of pretest (expected) probability of response. Once this population of patients with tumors showing extreme drug resistance had been identified, posttest response probabilities for the remaining cohorts of patients varied according to both assay results and pretest response probabilities, precisely according to predictions based on Bayes' theorem. This finding allowed the construction of a nomogram for determining assay-predicted probability of response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Precision medicine for cancer with next-generation functional diagnostics
Friedman, A. A., Letai, A., Fisher, D. E., & Flaherty, K. T. (2015) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc4015 · Cited by 570
Functional precision cancer medicine—moving beyond pure genomics
Letai, A. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4389 · Cited by 366
Clonogenic assay with established human tumour xenografts
Fiebig, H. H., Maier, A., & Burger, A. M. (2004) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.01.009 · Cited by 291
Falagas, M. E., & Karageorgopoulos, D. E. (2008) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/528867 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Kern, D. H., & Weisenthal, L. M.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-04-04
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 582-588
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2136776823
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Specific Prediction of Antineoplastic Drug Resistance With an In Vitro Assay Using Suprapharmacologic Drug Exposures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/82.7.582
- The paper
- Kern, D. H., & Weisenthal, L. M. (1990). Highly Specific Prediction of Antineoplastic Drug Resistance With an In Vitro Assay Using Suprapharmacologic Drug Exposures. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/82.7.582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.