The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychological Distress and Surveillance Behaviors of Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer
Abstract
Women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk for developing the disease. This study investigated the beliefs of women at high risk for breast cancer (one or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer) about their breast cancer risk and the impact of this information on their surveillance behaviors and psychological distress. The Health Belief Model and the Fear Arousing Communications Theory were used in this study. Two hundred and seventeen women, enrolled in a breast protection program, completed a questionnaire regarding health beliefs and behaviors, social support, and psychological distress. While 94% came in for regularly scheduled mammograms, only 69% came in for regular clinical breast examinations. A discriminant function analysis revealed that increased cancer anxiety decreased regular clinical examinations (coefficient = -.65). Only 40% performed breast self-examination monthly, 10% never performed breast self-examination, and 50% did not perform breast self-examination regularly. High breast self-examination performance prior to coming to the program was the best predictor of current breast self-examination, and high anxiety predicted poor adherence to monthly breast self-examination (multiple R = .61). More than 27% of the women at high risk were defined as having a level of psychological distress consistent with the need for counseling. Women reporting more barriers to screening, fewer social supports, and low social desirability had more psychological distress (multiple R = .75). Higher anxiety was directly related to poor attendance at a clinical breast examination and poor adherence to monthly breast self-examination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Belief and feeling: Evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.6.934 · Cited by 1,806
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.168.7.818 · Cited by 911
Stoller, J., Snider, G., Brantly, M., Fallat, R., Stockley, R., Turino, G., Konietzko, N., Dirksen, A., Eden, E., Fallat, R., et al. (2005) · Pneumologie · doi:10.1055/s-2004-830176 · Cited by 477
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY: Mapping Biobehavioral Contributions to Health and Illness
Baum, A., & Posluszny, D. M. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.137 · Cited by 413
Hay, J. L., McCaul, K. D., & Magnan, R. E. (2006) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.03.002 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., & Miller, D. G.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-01-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-30
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2047292805
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological Distress and Surveillance Behaviors of Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/84.1.24
- The paper
- Kash, K. M., Holland, J. C., Halper, M. S., & Miller, D. G. (1992). Psychological Distress and Surveillance Behaviors of Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/84.1.24
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.