The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Malignant Glioma Trials
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite notable technical advances in therapy for malignant gliomas during the past decade, improved patient survival has not been clearly documented, suggesting that pretreatment prognostic factors influence outcome more than minor modifications in therapy. Age, performance status, and tumor histopathology have been identified as the pretreatment variables most predictive of survival outcome. However, an analysis of the association of survival with both pretreatment characteristics and treatment-related variables is necessary to assure reliable evaluation of new approaches for treatment of malignant glioma. PURPOSE: This study of malignant glioma patients used a non-parametric statistical technique to examine the associations of both pretreatment patient and tumor characteristics and treatment-related variables with survival duration. This technique was used to identify subgroups with survival rates sufficiently different to create improvements in the design and stratification of clinical trials. METHODS: We used a recursive partitioning technique to analyze survival in 1578 patients entered in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials from 1974 to 1989 that used several radiation therapy (RT) regimens with and without chemotherapy or a radiation sensitizer. This approach creates a regression tree according to prognostic variables that classifies patients into homogeneous subsets by survival. Twenty-six pretreatment characteristics and six treatment-related variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The years). Patients younger than 50 years old were categorized by histology (astrocytomas with anaplastic or atypical foci [AAF] versus glioblastoma multiforme [GBM]) and subsequently by normal or abnormal mental status for AAF patients and by performance status for those with GBM. For patients aged 50 years or older, performance status was the most important variable, with normal or abnormal mental status creating the only significant split in the poorer performance status group. Treatment-related variables produced a subgroup showing significant differences only for better performance status GBM patients over age 50 (by extent of surgery and RT dose). Median survival times were 4.7-58.6 months for the 12 subgroups resulting from this analysis, which ranged in size from 32 to 256 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This approach permits examination of the interaction between prognostic variables not possible with other forms of multivariate analysis. IMPLICATIONS: The recursive partitioning technique can be employed to refine the stratification and design of malignant glioma trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., Belanger, K., Brandes, A. A., Marosi, C., Bogdahn, U., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330 · Cited by 21,807
Verhaak, R. G. W., Hoadley, K. A., Purdom, E., Wang, V., Qi, Y., Wilkerson, M. D., Miller, C. R., Ding, L., Golub, T., Mesirov, J. P., et al. (2010) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020 · Cited by 7,575
Wen, P. Y., & Kesari, S. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0708126 · Cited by 3,511
Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial
Gilbert, M. R., Wang, M., Aldape, K. D., Stupp, R., Hegi, M. E., Jaeckle, K. A., Armstrong, T. S., Wefel, J. S., Won, M., Blumenthal, D. T., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.6968 · Cited by 1,063
Self-citationEpidemiology of primary brain tumors: Current concepts and review of the literature
Wrensch, M., Minn, Y., Chew, T., Bondy, M., & Berger, M. S. (2002) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/4.4.278 · Cited by 837
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, W. J., Scott, C. B., Horton, J., Nelson, J. S., Weinstein, A. S., Fischbach, A. J., Chang, C. H., Rotman, M., Asbell, S. O., Krisch, R. E., & Nelson, D. F.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-05-05
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 704-710
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2001660159
- Cited by
- 1,310
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Malignant Glioma Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/85.9.704
- The paper
- Curran, W. J., Scott, C. B., Horton, J., Nelson, J. S., Weinstein, A. S., Fischbach, A. J., Chang, C. H., Rotman, M., Asbell, S. O., Krisch, R. E., & Nelson, D. F. (1993). Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Malignant Glioma Trials. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.9.704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.