The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Sociodemographic Predictors Among White, Black, and Hispanic Women
Open accessAbstract
Objectives. We evaluated the relationship between breast and cervical cancer screening and a variety of variables across race/ethnicity groups. Methods. Using logistic regression models, we analyzed data from the 1998 National Health Interview Survey to assess the relative importance of the independent variables in predicting use of cancer screening services. Results. Having a usual source of care was the most important predictor of cancer screening use for all race/ethnicity groups. Health insurance was associated with an increased likelihood of cancer screening. Smoking was associated with a decreased likelihood of cancer screening. Conclusions. Regardless of race/ethnicity, most women follow mammography and cervical cancer screening guidelines. The identification of specific factors associated with adherence to cancer screening guidelines may help inform screening campaigns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yu, S. M. (1998) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1021801927353 · Cited by 4,056
REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY
Tabár, L., Gad, A., Holmberg, L. H., Ljungquist, U., Fagerberg, C. J. G., Baldetorp, L., Gröntoft, O., Lundström, B., Månson, J. C., Eklund, G., et al. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4 · Cited by 1,781
Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis
Kerlikowske, K. M. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.273.2.149 · Cited by 1,131
Ten- to Fourteen-Year Effect of Screening on Breast Cancer Mortality 2
(1982) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/69.2.349 · Cited by 840
Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
Botman, S., & Moriarity, C. L. (2000) · Cited by 785
Buxó Rey, J. (1986) · PubMed · Cited by 750
Lăără, E., Day, N., & Hakama, M. (1987) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92695-x · Cited by 657
Racial/ethnic patterns of cancer in the United States, 1988-1992.
Miller, B.-A., Kolonel, L. N., Bernstein, L., Young, J. L., Swanson, G., West, D. W., Key, C., Liff, J. M., Glover, C. S., & Alexander, G. A. (1996) · Cited by 500
Concordance of Self-reported Data and Medical Record Audit for Six Cancer Screening Procedures
Gordon, N. P., Hiatt, R. A., & Lampert, D. I. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.7.566 · Cited by 415
Elledge, R. M., Clark, G. M., Chamness, G. C., & Osborne, C. K. (1994) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/86.9.705 · Cited by 414
Cited by
(2006) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 224
Cervical Cancer Screening Among Young Adult Women in the United States
Roland, K. B., Benard, V. B., Soman, A., Breen, N., Kepka, D., & Saraiya, M. (2013) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-12-1266 · Cited by 30
Maheshwari, V., Girotra, S., Malik, M., & Basu, S. (2025) · Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment · doi:10.4103/crst.crst_99_24 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Selvin, E., & Brett, K. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 618-623
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2138545922
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Sociodemographic Predictors Among White, Black, and Hispanic Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.93.4.618
- The paper
- Selvin, E., & Brett, K. M. (2003). Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Sociodemographic Predictors Among White, Black, and Hispanic Women. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.4.618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
