The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: Role of Obesity and Diet
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the United States, the incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, including the esophagogastric junction, has been increasing rapidly over the past two decades. Except for an association with Barrett's esophagus, little is known about the etiology of these cancers. PURPOSE: Our purpose was to investigate dietary and nutritional risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. METHODS: A population-based, case-control interview study of 174 white men with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and 750 control subjects living in three areas of the United States was conducted during 1986 through 1989. RESULTS: Risk was significantly elevated for subjects in the heaviest quartile compared with the lightest quartile of body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8-5.3). No significant associations were seen with total calories from food, number of meals eaten per day, level of fat intake, or consumption of coffee and tea. Risks were highest for those consuming the least amount of vegetables, with some evidence of a dose response for the subcategories of cruciferous vegetables (P for trend < .001) and vegetables consumed raw (P for trend = .10). A significantly elevated risk was also seen for those consuming the least amount of raw fruit (P for trend = .05). No clear associations were reported for intake of particular micronutrients overall or in supplements, but a significant protective effect was associated with increasing intake of dietary fiber (P for trend = .004). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of an increased risk with obesity and decreased risks with intake of raw fruits and vegetables and dietary fiber provide useful directions to pursue in further investigations of this malignancy. IMPLICATIONS: The finding with respect to obesity is particularly noteworthy, since it may explain at least a portion of the recent epidemic increases reported in the incidence of this tumor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F. I., & Devesa, S. S. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00267-2 · Cited by 2,169
High-Temperature Beverages and Foods and Esophageal Cancer Risk—A Systematic Review
Islami, F., Boffetta, P., Ren, J., Pedoeim, L., Khatib, D., & Kamangar, F. (2009) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.24445 · Cited by 322
Risk Factors for the Development of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett's Esophagus
de Jonge, P. J. F., Steyerberg, E. W., Kuipers, E. J., Honkoop, P., Wolters, L. M. M., Kerkhof, M., van Dekken, H., & Siersema, P. D. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00626.x · Cited by 104
Turati, F., Galeone, C., La Vecchia, C., Garavello, W., & Tavani, A. (2011) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdq603 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris Brown, L., Swanson, C. A., Gridley, G., Swanson, G. M., Schoenberg, J. B., Greenberg, R. S., Silverman, D. T., Pottern, L. M., Hayes, R. B., Schwartz, A. G., Liff, J. M., Fraumeni, J. F., & Hoover, R. N.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-01-18
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-109
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2097731048
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.