Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Recruiting Minorities Into Clinical Trials Toward a Participant-Friendly System

Swanson, G. M., Ward, A. J.·1995·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to describe the state of the art in recruiting participants for clinical trials designed to test new methods of treatment or disease prevention. The ultimate objective of this review is to provide a summary of key issues in recruiting diverse populations into clinical trials, particularly ethnic and racial minorities. An overview of general issues related to clinical trial participation is followed by a detailed discussion of specific issues that must be addressed by investigators as they recruit minority populations for clinical trial. To date, the majority of clinical trials have included a limited segment of the U.S. population: middle-class, married white males. These trials have faced many problems in their efforts to recruit participants, including barriers to physician participation, barriers to subject participation, barriers to planning and implementing effective recruitment strategies, and costs of the recruitment phase of clinical trials. Following this general introduction is a discussion of the definition of diverse populations. The first step investigators must take as they prepare to recruit study participants is to develop a relevant definition of the subject populations. A detailed review of investigators' experiences in recruiting minorities into clinical trials is presented, including barriers to minority recruitment, barriers inherent in study design, researcher bias, barriers to minority physician participation, as well as strategies for minority recruitment, modifications of study design, and cost issues. Formal evaluation of recruitment strategies has been limited. Most investigators present descriptive reports of their experience in recruiting diverse populations into clinical trials. Research into the issues presented and rigorous testing of specific strategies is needed. A series of steps that are essential to effective clinical trials recruitment of diverse populations is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Swanson, G. M., & Ward, A. J.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1995-12-06
Volume
87
Issue
23
Pages
1747-1759
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2030093943
Cited by
554
References
0
FWCI
16.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recruiting Minorities Into Clinical Trials Toward a Participant-Friendly System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747
The paper
Swanson, G. M., & Ward, A. J. (1995). Recruiting Minorities Into Clinical Trials Toward a Participant-Friendly System. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/87.23.1747

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.