The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improved Survival in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Seven-Year Follow-up of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8433 Trial
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: For many years, high dose radiation therapy was the standard treatment for patients with locally or regionally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), despite a 5-year survival rate of only 3%-10% following such therapy. From May 1984 through May 1987, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a randomized trial that showed that induction chemotherapy before radiation therapy improved survival during the first 3 years of follow-up. PURPOSE: This report provides data for 7 years of follow-up of patients enrolled in the CALGB trial. METHODS: The patient population consisted of individuals who had clinical or surgical stage III, histologically documented NSCLC; a CALGB performance status of 0-1; less than 5% loss of body weight in the 3 months preceding diagnosis; and radiographically visible disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1) cisplatin (100 mg/m2 body surface area intravenously on days 1 and 29) and vinblastine (5 mg/m2 body surface area intravenously weekly on days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29) followed by radiation therapy with 6000 cGy given in 30 fractions beginning on day 50 (CT-RT group) or 2) radiation therapy with 6000 cGy alone beginning on day 1 (RT group) for a maximum duration of 6-7 weeks. Patients were evaluated for tumor regression if they had measurable or evaluable disease and were monitored for toxic effects, disease progression, and date of death. RESULTS: There were 78 eligible patients randomly assigned to the CT-RT group and 77 randomly assigned to the RT group. Both groups were similar in terms of sex, age, histologic cell type, performance status, substage of disease, and whether staging had been clinical or surgical. All patients had measurable or evaluable disease at the time of random assignment to treatment groups. Both groups received a similar quantity and quality of radiation therapy. As previously reported, the rate of tumor response, as determined radiographically, was 56% for the CT-RT group and 43% for the RT group (P = .092). After more than 7 years of follow-up, the median survival remains greater for the CT-RT group (13.7 months) than for the RT group (9.6 months) (P = .012) as ascertained by the logrank test (two-sided). The percentages of patients surviving after years 1 through 7 were 54, 26, 24, 19, 17, 13, and 13 for the CT-RT group and 40, 13, 10, 7, 6, 6, and 6 for the RT group. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up confirms that patients with stage III NSCLC who receive 5 weeks of chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinblastine before radiation therapy have a 4.1-month increase in median survival. The use of sequential chemotherapy-radiotherapy increases the projected proportion of 5-year survivors by a factor of 2.8 compared with that of radiotherapy alone. However, inasmuch as 80%-85% of such patients still die within 5 years and because treatment failure occurs both in the irradiated field and at distant sites in patients receiving either sequential chemotherapy-radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone, the need for further improvements in both the local and systemic treatment of this disease persists.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Chun, S. G., Hu, C., Choy, H., Komaki, R. U., Timmerman, R. D., Schild, S. E., Bogart, J. A., Dobelbower, M. C., Bosch, W., Galvin, J. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.69.1378 · Cited by 746
Bradley, J., Graham, M. V., Winter, K., Purdy, J. A., Komaki, R., Roa, W. H., Ryu, J. K., Bosch, W., & Emami, B. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.260 · Cited by 441
Machtay, M., Bae, K., Movsas, B., Paulus, R., Gore, E. M., Komaki, R., Albain, K., Sause, W. T., & Curran, W. J. (2012) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.004 · Cited by 296
The outcome of combined-modality therapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly
Schild, S. E., Stella, P. J., Geyer, S. M., Bonner, J. A., McGinnis, W. L., Mailliard, J. A., Brindle, J., Jatoi, A., & Jett, J. R. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.12.019 · Cited by 222
Chaft, J. E., Litvak, A., Arcila, M. E., Patel, P., D'Angelo, S. P., Krug, L. M., Rusch, V., Mattson, A., Coeshott, C., Park, B., et al. (2014) · Clinical Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2014.06.002 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Dillman, R. O., Herndon, J., Seagren, S. L., Eaton, W. L., & Green, M. R.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-09-04
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1210-1215
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2155053061
- Cited by
- 923
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Survival in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Seven-Year Follow-up of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8433 Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/88.17.1210
- The paper
- Dillman, R. O., Herndon, J., Seagren, S. L., Eaton, W. L., & Green, M. R. (1996). Improved Survival in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Seven-Year Follow-up of Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 8433 Trial. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.17.1210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.