The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microscopic Benign and Invasive Malignant Neoplasms and a Cancer-Prone Phenotype in Prophylactic Oophorectomies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The occurrence of approximately 5% of common epithelial malignant tumors of the ovary can be traced to inheritance of risk. One prophylactic strategy to decrease the probability of development of disease in individuals within families where this mendelian-dominant pattern of occurrence is apparent is to remove the ovaries of individuals at risk for ovarian cancer. The procedure, when done for this purpose, is recommended soon after completion of childbearing. PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare the histologic features of the ovaries of women at increased risk for ovarian cancer to those at no known increased risk for the disease. METHODS: Ovaries removed for prophylaxis from 20 women considered to be at increased risk for developing ovarian cancer were examined histologically. During the course of this work, it seemed apparent that these ovaries contained numerous atypical features compared with the expected appearance of normal ovaries. Hence, we expanded the study to include a control group whose ovaries were removed for reasons unrelated to cancer. The study, therefore, was not blinded. The increased risk in the cancer-prone individuals was determined by family history, specifically the presence of at least one first-degree relative and one second-degree relative with ovarian and/or breast cancer and positive linkage or mutational analysis of BRCA1 in some. The difference in mean ages of patients in the control and high-risk groups was not statistically significant. The difference among both groups with respect to the number of atypical features as well as the intensity of those features was ascertained by computing probabilities using Fisher's exact test (two-sided) for rows x columns contingency tables. RESULTS: Two unanticipated microscopic or near-microscopic malignant neoplasms and other benign and borderline tumors were discovered in the ovaries of the high-risk individuals. Of substantial interest was the finding that among the ovaries of high-risk women, 85% presented two or more and 75% presented three or more of the following histologic features: surface epithelial pseudostratification; surface papillomatosis; deep cortical invaginations of the surface epithelium, frequently with multiple papillary projections within small cystic spaces (microscopic papillary cystadenomas); epithelial inclusion cysts, frequently with epithelial hyperplasia and papillary formations; cortical stromal hyperplasia and hyperthecosis; increased follicular activity; corpus luteum hyperplasia; or hilar cell hyperplasia. Two or more or three or more such changes were observed in a lesser percentage (30% or 10%, respectively) of ovaries obtained from the control individuals, with a statistically significant difference (P = .001 or P = .00007, respectively), particularly considering that a detailed determination of a family history of cancer in the control group was not possible. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of these changes in the high-risk ovaries compared with control ovaries suggests a characteristic histologic preneoplastic phenotype defined by an increased frequency and intensity of the above-described histologic features in the high-risk ovaries. Limited access to numerous small (stage I) ovarian cancers or cancer-prone ovaries by any one pathologist may explain the failure to identify the phenotype in the past. IMPLICATIONS: We suggest that the ovaries removed from ovarian cancer-prone individuals as a preventative measure should be thoroughly examined histologically to identify or rule out microscopic or near-microscopic invasive neoplasms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods in Medical Research.
Armitage, P. (1972) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2556182 · Cited by 4,029
Hypermutability and mismatch repair deficiency in RER+ tumor cells
Parsons, R., Li, G.-M., Longley, M. J., Fang, W.-H., Papadopoulos, N., Jen, J., de la Chapelle, A., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Modrich, P. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90331-j · Cited by 1,053
Estimates of the worldwide frequency of sixteen major cancers in 1980
Parkin, D. M., Läärä, E., & Muir, C. S. (1988) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.2910410205 · Cited by 1,047
Basic and clinical biostatistics
Price, W. A. (1991) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83379-7 · Cited by 670
Friedman, L. S., Ostermeyer, E. A., Szabo, C. I., Dowd, P., Lynch, E. D., Rowell, S. E., & King, M.-C. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1294-399 · Cited by 622
Gayther, S. A., Warren, W., Mazoyer, S., Russell, P. A., Harrington, P. A., Chiano, M., Seal, S., Hamoudi, R., van Rensburg, E. J., Dunning, A. M., et al. (1995) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1295-428 · Cited by 496
Histological Typing of Female Genital Tract Tumours
Scully, R. E., Bonfiglio, T. A., Kurman, R. J., Silverberg, S. G., & Wilkinson, E. J. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85014-1 · Cited by 491
Mutations in the BRCA1 gene in families with early-onset breast and ovarian cancer
Castilla, L. H., Couch, F. J., Erdos, M. R., Hoskins, K. F., Calzone, K., Garber, J. E., Boyd, J., Lubin, M. B., Deshano, M. L., Brody, L. C., et al. (1994) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1294-387 · Cited by 383
INTRA-ABDOMINAL CARCINOMATOSIS AFTER PROPHYLACTIC OOPHORECTOMY IN OVARIAN-CANCER-PRONE FAMILIES
Tobacman, J., Tucker, M., Kase, R., Greene, M., Costa, J., & Fraumeni, J. (1982) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92681-2 · Cited by 351
Shattuck-Eidens, D. M. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.273.7.535 · Cited by 327
Cited by
Ovarian Surface Epithelium: Biology, Endocrinology, and Pathology*
Auersperg, N., Wong, A. S. T., Choi, K.-C., Kang, S. K., & Leung, P. C. K. (2001) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.22.2.0422 · Cited by 1,046
BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyond
Narod, S. A., & Foulkes, W. D. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1431 · Cited by 967
Risch, H. A. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.23.1774 · Cited by 771
New Insights Into the Pathogenesis of Serous Ovarian Cancer and Its Clinical Impact
Levanon, K., Crum, C., & Drapkin, R. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.1107 · Cited by 412
Ahmed, N., Thompson, E. W., & Quinn, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.21240 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Salazar, H., Godwin, A. K., Daly, M. B., Laub, P. B., Hogan, W. M., Rosenblum, N., Boente, M. P., Lynch, H. T., & Hamilton, T. C.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-12-18
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1810-1820
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2156728001
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microscopic Benign and Invasive Malignant Neoplasms and a Cancer-Prone Phenotype in Prophylactic Oophorectomies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/88.24.1810
- The paper
- Salazar, H., Godwin, A. K., Daly, M. B., Laub, P. B., Hogan, W. M., Rosenblum, N., Boente, M. P., Lynch, H. T., & Hamilton, T. C. (1996). Microscopic Benign and Invasive Malignant Neoplasms and a Cancer-Prone Phenotype in Prophylactic Oophorectomies. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.24.1810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.