The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A collaborative survey of 80 mutations in the BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Implications for presymptomatic testing and screening
Abstract
Objectives. —To report the initial experience of an international group of investigators in identifying mutations in theBRCA1breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene, to assess the spectrum of such mutations in samples from patients with different family histories of cancer, and to determine the frequency of recurrent mutations. Design. —Nine laboratories in North America and the United Kingdom tested forBRCA 1mutations in DNA samples obtained from a total of 372 unrelated patients with breast or ovarian cancer largely chosen from high-risk families. Three of these laboratories also analyzed a total of 714 additional samples from breast or ovarian cancer cases, including 557 unselected for family history, for two specific mutations that had been found to recur in familial samples. Participants. —A total of 1086 women with either breast or ovarian cancer. Main Outcome Measure. —The detection of sequence variation in patients' DNA samples that is not found in sets of control samples. Results. —BRCA 1mutations have now been identified in a total of 80 patient samples. Thirty-eight distinct mutations were found among 63 mutations identified through a complete screen of theBRCA 1gene. Three specific mutations appeared relatively common, occurring eight, seven, and five times, respectively. When specific tests for the two most common mutations were performed in larger sets of samples, they were found in 17 additional patients. Mutations predicted to result in a truncated protein accounted for 86% of the mutations detected by complete screening. Conclusions. —The high frequency of protein-terminating mutations and the observation of many recurrent mutations found in a diverse set of samples could lead to a relatively simple diagnostic test forBRCA 1mutations. More data must be accumulated to address specifically the sensitivity and specificity of such a diagnostic testing procedure and to better estimate the age-specific risk for breast and ovarian cancer associated with such mutations. (JAMA. 1995;273:535-541)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers
FORD, D. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91578-4 · Cited by 1,850
Cited by
Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in Mitotic and Meiotic Cells
Scully, R., Chen, J., Plug, A., Xiao, Y., Weaver, D., Feunteun, J., Ashley, T., & Livingston, D. M. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81847-4 · Cited by 1,459
Burke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
Yu, X., Wu, L. C., Bowcock, A. M., Aronheim, A., & Baer, R. (1998) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.273.39.25388 · Cited by 389
Identifying modifier genes of monogenic disease: strategies and difficulties
Génin, E., Feingold, J., & Clerget-Darpoux, F. (2008) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00439-008-0560-2 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Shattuck-Eidens, D. M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association
- Published
- 1995-02-15
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 535-541
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249792293
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A collaborative survey of 80 mutations in the BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Implications for presymptomatic testing and screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.273.7.535
- The paper
- Shattuck-Eidens, D. M. (1995). A collaborative survey of 80 mutations in the BRCA1 breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. Implications for presymptomatic testing and screening. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.273.7.535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.