Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of p21WAF1/CIP1 Expression on Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer

Stein, John P., Ginsberg, David A., Grossfeld, Gary D., Chatterjee, Sunanda J., Esrig, David, Dickinson, Ming G., Groshen, Susan, Taylor, Clive R., Jones, Peter A., Skinner, Donald G., Cote, Richard J.·1998·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Altered expression of p53 protein is an important predictor of progression in bladder cancer. The action of p53 on cell cycle regulation is mediated, in part, through expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF/CIP1 (p21). Loss of p21 expression may, therefore, contribute to tumor progression. We sought to determine the relationship between p21 expression in bladder cancer and disease progression. METHODS: Tumor specimens were obtained from 242 patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer. Median follow-up was 8.5 years (range, 0.1-11.8 years). Nuclear p21 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and was then analyzed in relationship to the probability of tumor recurrence, overall survival, and tumor p53 status. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Nuclear p21 expression was detected in the tumors of 156 (64%) of the 242 patients. Patients with p21-positive tumors had a decreased probability of tumor recurrence (P<.00001) and an increased probability of overall survival (P<.00001) in comparison with patients with p21-negative tumors. In a multivariable analysis, p21 expression was an independent predictor of tumor recurrence (P = .0017) and of survival (P = .006) when assessed with tumor grade, tumor stage, lymph node status, and p53 status. p21 expression was associated with p53 status (P<.001); 56% of tumors with p53 alterations showed loss of p21 expression, whereas 79% of tumors expressing wild-type p53 were p21 positive. Patients with p53-altered/p21-negative tumors demonstrated a higher rate of recurrence and worse survival compared with those with p53-altered/p21-positive tumors (P<.0001). Patients with 53-altered/p21-positive tumors demonstrated a similar rate of recurrence and survival as those with p53-wild type tumors. CONCLUSION: Loss of p21 expression is a statistically significant and independent predictor of bladder cancer progression. Maintenance of p21 expression appears to abrogate the deleterious effects of p53 alterations on bladder cancer progression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/90.14.1072

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Stein, J. P., Ginsberg, D. A., Grossfeld, G. D., Chatterjee, S. J., Esrig, D., Dickinson, M. G., Groshen, S., Taylor, C. R., Jones, P. A., Skinner, D. G., & Cote, R. J.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1998-07-15
Volume
90
Issue
14
Pages
1072-1079
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2119682635
Cited by
299
References
32
FWCI
22.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of p21WAF1/CIP1 Expression on Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/90.14.1072
The paper
Stein, J. P., Ginsberg, D. A., Grossfeld, G. D., Chatterjee, S. J., Esrig, D., Dickinson, M. G., Groshen, S., Taylor, C. R., Jones, P. A., Skinner, D. G., & Cote, R. J. (1998). Effect of p21WAF1/CIP1 Expression on Tumor Progression in Bladder Cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.14.1072

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.