Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 775

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: Results in a Large Series

Open access
Veronesi, U., Paganelli, G., Viale, G., Galimberti, V., Luini, A., Zurrida, S., Robertson, C., Sacchini, V., Veronesi, P., Orvieto, E., De Cicco, C., Intra, M., Tosi, G., Scarpa, D.·1999·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection is an established component of the surgical treatment of breast cancer, and is an important procedure in cancer staging; however, it is associated with unpleasant side effects. We have investigated a radioactive tracer-guided procedure that facilitates identification, removal, and pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node (i.e., the lymph node first receiving lymphatic fluid from the area of the breast containing the tumor) to predict the status of the axilla and to assess the safety of foregoing axillary dissection if the sentinel lymph node shows no involvement. METHODS: We injected 5-10 MBq of 99mTc-labeled colloidal particles of human albumin peritumorally in 376 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were enrolled at the European Institute of Oncology during the period from March 1996 through March 1998. The sentinel lymph node in each case was visualized by lymphoscintigraphy, and its general location was marked on the overlying skin. During breast surgery, the sentinel lymph node was identified for removal by monitoring the acoustic signal from a hand-held gamma ray-detecting probe. Total axillary dissection was then carried out. The pathologic status of the sentinel lymph node was compared with that of the whole axilla. RESULTS: The sentinel lymph node was identified in 371 (98.7%) of the 376 patients and accurately predicted the state of the axilla in 359 (95.5%) of the patients, with 12 false-negative findings (6.7%; 95% confidence interval = 3.5%-11.4%) among a total of 180 patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy using a gamma ray-detecting probe allows staging of the axilla with high accuracy in patients with primary breast cancer. A randomized trial is necessary to determine whether axillary dissection may be avoided in those patients with an uninvolved sentinel lymph node.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/91.4.368

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 775

Metadata

Authors
Veronesi, U., Paganelli, G., Viale, G., Galimberti, V., Luini, A., Zurrida, S., Robertson, C., Sacchini, V., Veronesi, P., Orvieto, E., De Cicco, C., Intra, M., Tosi, G., & Scarpa, D.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
1999-02-17
Volume
91
Issue
4
Pages
368-373
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2036977094
Cited by
775
References
0
FWCI
26.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: Results in a Large Series. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/91.4.368
The paper
Veronesi, U., Paganelli, G., Viale, G., Galimberti, V., Luini, A., Zurrida, S., Robertson, C., Sacchini, V., Veronesi, P., Orvieto, E., De Cicco, C., Intra, M., Tosi, G., & Scarpa, D. (1999). Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: Results in a Large Series. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.4.368

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.