The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plasma Prolactin Levels and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In animal studies, prolactin has been found to be important for mammary epithelial development and its administration has been shown consistently to increase the rate of mammary tumor formation. Previous epidemiologic studies of prolactin and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women have been limited in size, and the results have been inconsistent. We conducted a nested case-control study within the prospective Nurses' Health Study cohort to better determine the relationship between plasma prolactin levels and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from cohort members during the period from 1989 through 1990. Prolactin levels were measured by use of a microparticle enzyme immunoassay. Included in this analysis were 306 postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with breast cancer after blood donation but before June 1994. One or two postmenopausal control subjects were matched per case subject on the basis of age, postmenopausal hormone use, and time of day and month of blood collection; the study included a total of 448 control subjects. RESULTS: In conditional logistic regression analyses, a significant positive association was observed between plasma level of prolactin and postmenopausal breast cancer risk (highest versus lowest quartile, multivariate relative risk = 2.03; 95% confidence interval = 1.24-3.31; two-sided P for trend = .01). The relationship was independent of plasma sex steroid hormone levels and was similar after excluding case subjects diagnosed in the first 2 years after blood collection. CONCLUSIONS: These prospective data suggest that higher plasma prolactin levels are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ISHIZUKA, B., QUIGLEY, M. E., & YEN, S. S. C. (1983) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-57-6-1111 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer
Boyd, N. F., Rommens, J. M., Vogt, K., Lee, V., Hopper, J. L., Yaffe, M. J., & Paterson, A. D. (2005) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(05)70390-9 · Cited by 613
The Nurses׳ Health Study: lifestyle and health among women
Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E. (2005) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1608 · Cited by 590
Self-citationUnderstanding breast cancer risk - where do we stand in 2005?
Dumitrescu, R. G., & Cotarla, I. (2005) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1582-4934.2005.tb00350.x · Cited by 502
Oestrogen exposure and breast cancer risk
Travis, R. C., & Key, T. J. (2003) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr628 · Cited by 346
Peuskens, J., Pani, L., Detraux, J., & De Hert, M. (2014) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-014-0157-3 · Cited by 350
Metadata
- Authors
- Hankinson, S. E., Willett, W. C., Michaud, D. S., Manson, J. E., Colditz, G. A., Longcope, C., Rosner, B., & Speizer, F. E.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-04-07
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 629-634
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2105028526
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasma Prolactin Levels and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/91.7.629
- The paper
- Hankinson, S. E., Willett, W. C., Michaud, D. S., Manson, J. E., Colditz, G. A., Longcope, C., Rosner, B., & Speizer, F. E. (1999). Plasma Prolactin Levels and Subsequent Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.7.629
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.