Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Repair of Tobacco Carcinogen-Induced DNA Adducts and Lung Cancer Risk: a Molecular Epidemiologic Study

Qingyi Wei·2000·Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only a fraction of cigarette smokers develop lung cancer, suggesting that people differ in their susceptibility to this disease. We investigated whether differences in DNA repair capacity (DRC) for repairing tobacco carcinogen-induced DNA damage are associated with differential susceptibility to lung cancer. METHODS: From August 1, 1995, through April 30, 1999, we conducted a hospital-based, case-control study of 316 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients and 316 cancer-free control subjects matched on age, sex, and smoking status. DRC was measured in cultured lymphocytes with the use of the host-cell reactivation assay with a reporter gene damaged by a known activated tobacco carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Overall, lower DRC was observed in case patients than in control subjects (P:<.001) and was associated with a greater than twofold increased risk of lung cancer. Compared with the highest DRC quartile in the control subjects and after adjustment for age, sex, pack-years of smoking, family history of cancer, and other covariates, reduced DRC was associated with increased risk of lung cancer in a dose-dependent fashion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8 with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-3.1, OR = 2.0 with 95% CI = 1.2-3.4, and OR = 4. 3 with 95% CI = 2.6-7.2 for the second, third, and fourth quartiles, respectively; P:(trend)<.001). Case patients who were younger at diagnosis (<60 years old), female, or lighter smokers or who reported a family history of cancer exhibited the lowest DRC and the highest lung cancer risk among their subgroups, suggesting that these subgroups may be especially susceptible to lung cancer. CONCLUSION: The results provide evidence that low DRC is associated with increased risk of lung cancer. The findings from this hospital-based, case-control study should be validated in prospective studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/92.21.1764

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Wei, Q.
Venue
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2000-11-01
Volume
92
Issue
21
Pages
1764-1772
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2135114425
Cited by
507
References
2
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repair of Tobacco Carcinogen-Induced DNA Adducts and Lung Cancer Risk: a Molecular Epidemiologic Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/92.21.1764
The paper
Wei, Q. (2000). Repair of Tobacco Carcinogen-Induced DNA Adducts and Lung Cancer Risk: a Molecular Epidemiologic Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.21.1764

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.