The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tumor Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Elderly Women With Breast Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of elderly patients with breast cancer is increasing. Limited age-related information available about this disease prompted this study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population was derived from 50828 and 256287 patients with invasive breast cancer in San Antonio breast cancer databases and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, respectively. Tumor biologic and clinical characteristics, local and systemic therapies, and survival according to the patient's age were analyzed. Survival was also compared with that of age-matched women from the general population. RESULTS: In patients 55 years old or older, there was an association between increasing age at diagnosis and the presence of more favorable biologic characteristics of the tumor, including more tumors that express steroid receptors, lower proliferative rates, diploidy, normal p53, and absence of the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and c-erbB2. In older patients with lymph node-negative disease and/or small tumors, the observed and expected survivals were almost identical. In the SEER registry, the 8-year survival of lymph node-negative patients relative to the expected survival of age-matched women from the general population was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98-1. 04) for patients 70-74 years old, 1.06 (95% CI = 1.01-1.11) for patients 75-79 years old, and 1.09 (95% CI = 0.98-1.20) for patients 80-84 years old. CONCLUSION: In women 55 years old or older, advancing age is associated with more favorable tumor biology, and breast cancer survival in older women is similar to survival in the general population irrespective of disease status. This favorable outcome should be considered when making clinical decisions in older patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Undertreatment Strongly Decreases Prognosis of Breast Cancer in Elderly Women
Bouchardy, C., Rapiti, E., Fioretta, G., Laissue, P., Neyroud-Caspar, I., Schäfer, P., Kurtz, J., Sappino, A.-P., & Vlastos, G. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.02.046 · Cited by 512
Breast Cancer Among the Oldest Old: Tumor Characteristics, Treatment Choices, and Survival
Schonberg, M. A., Marcantonio, E. R., Li, D., Silliman, R. A., Ngo, L., & McCarthy, E. P. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.9796 · Cited by 422
The Confluence of Sex Hormones and Aging on Immunity
Gubbels Bupp, M. R., Potluri, T., Fink, A. L., & Klein, S. L. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01269 · Cited by 277
Age-specific changes in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes: a focus on older women
Jenkins, E. O., Deal, A. M., Anders, C. K., Prat, A., Perou, C. M., Carey, L. A., & Muss, H. B. (2014) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0184 · Cited by 165
Sheppard, V. B., Faul, L. A., Luta, G., Clapp, J. D., Yung, R. L., Wang, J. H.-Y., Kimmick, G., Isaacs, C., Tallarico, M., Barry, W. T., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.51.7367 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Diab, S. G.
- Venue
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-04-05
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 550-556
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2138624842
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Elderly Women With Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/92.7.550
- The paper
- Diab, S. G. (2000). Tumor Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Elderly Women With Breast Cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.7.550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.