Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plasma Folate, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, Homocysteine, and Risk of Breast Cancer

Zhang, S. M., Willett, W. C., Selhub, J., Hunter, D. J., Giovannucci, E. L., Holmes, M. D., Colditz, G. A., Hankinson, S. E.·2003·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In several epidemiologic investigations, folate intake has appeared to reduce the elevated risk of breast cancer associated with moderate alcohol consumption. However, data relating plasma folate levels to breast cancer risk are sparse. We investigated the association between plasma folate and other vitamins with breast cancer in a prospective, nested case-control study. METHODS: Blood samples were obtained during 1989 and 1990 from 32 826 women in the Nurses' Health Study who were followed through 1996 for the development of breast cancer. We identified 712 breast cancer case patients and selected 712 individually matched control subjects. Dietary information was obtained using food frequency questionnaires given in 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1990. Logistic regression was used to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of breast cancer (after adjustment for potential risk factors), and a generalized linear model was used to calculate the Pearson correlation coefficients between plasma estimates of folate, vitamin B(6), vitamin B(12), and homocysteine, and intakes of folate, vitamin B(6), and vitamin B(12). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The multivariable RR comparing women in the highest quintile of plasma folate with those in the lowest was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 1.07; P(trend) =.06). The inverse association between plasma folate and breast cancer risk was highly statistically significant among women consuming at least 15 g/day (i.e., approximately 1 drink/day) of alcohol (multivariable RR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.59 for highest versus lowest quintile) in contrast with that of women consuming less than 15 g/day (multivariable RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.49 to 1.05). The multivariable RR comparing women in the highest quintile of plasma vitamin B(6) levels with those in the lowest quintile was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.48 to 1.02; P(trend) =.09). Plasma vitamin B(12) levels were inversely associated with breast cancer risk among premenopausal women (multivariable RR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.15 to 0.86 for highest versus lowest quintile) but not among postmenopausal women. Plasma homocysteine was not associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: Higher plasma levels of folate and possibly vitamin B(6) may reduce the risk of developing breast cancer. Achieving adequate circulating levels of folate may be particularly important for women at higher risk of developing breast cancer because of higher alcohol consumption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/95.5.373

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Ames, 2001, Mutation Research, 475, 7, 10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00070-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1996, Oncology, 10, 1727
  3. Blount, 1997, PNAS, 94, 3290, 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3290 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cooper, 1983, Annual review of biochemistry, 52, 187, 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.001155 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Selhub, 1993, JAMA, 270, 2693, 10.1001/jama.1993.03510220049033 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Tully, 1994, The FASEB Journal, 8, 343, 10.1096/fasebj.8.3.8143940 · DOI
  7. Zhang, 1999, JAMA, 281, 1632, 10.1001/jama.281.17.1632 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Rohan, 2000, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92, 266, 10.1093/jnci/92.3.266 · DOI
  9. Sellers, 2001, Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 12, 420, 10.1097/00001648-200107000-00012 · DOI
  10. Negri, 2000, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 92, 1270, 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1270 · DOI
  11. Ronco, 1999, Nutrition and cancer, 35, 111, 10.1207/S15327914NC352_3 · DOI
  12. Freudenheim, 1996, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88, 340, 10.1093/jnci/88.6.340 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Graham, 1991, American Journal of Epidemiology, 134, 552, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116129 · DOI
  14. Levi, 2001, International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 91, 260, 10.1002/1097-0215(200002)9999:9999<::AID-IJC1041>3.3.CO;2-R · DOI
  15. Shrubsole, 2001, Cancer Research, 61, 7136
  16. Smith-Warner, 1998, JAMA, 279, 535, 10.1001/jama.279.7.535 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hillman, 1982, Annual review of medicine, 33, 345, 10.1146/annurev.me.33.020182.002021 · DOI
  18. Weir, 1985, Biochemical pharmacology, 34, 1, 10.1016/0006-2952(85)90092-9 · DOI
  19. Wu, 1999, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, 8, 209
  20. Hankinson, 1995, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87, 1297, 10.1093/jnci/87.17.1297 · DOI · Paper page
  21. WILLETT, 1988, American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, 188, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114780 · DOI · Paper page
  22. SALVINI, 1989, International Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 858, 10.1093/ije/18.4.858 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Giovannucci, 1993, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85, 875, 10.1093/jnci/85.11.875 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Araki, 1987, Journal of Chromatography, 422, 43, 10.1016/0378-4347(87)80438-3 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 1981, Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 4, 123, 10.1007/BF02263621 · DOI
  26. Laird, 1982, Biometrics, 38, 963, 10.2307/2529876 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Potischman, 1999, International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer, 82, 315, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990730)82:3<315::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-N · DOI
  28. Hidiroglou, 1994, Biochemical pharmacology, 47, 1561, 10.1016/0006-2952(94)90532-0 · DOI
  29. Barak, 1993, Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 10, 495, 10.1016/0741-8329(93)90072-V · DOI
  30. Shaw, 1989, The Biochemical journal, 257, 277, 10.1042/bj2570277 · DOI
  31. Guynn, 1982, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 217, 181, 10.1016/0003-9861(82)90492-1 · DOI
  32. 1973, FEDERAL REGISTER AUGUST, 38, 20725

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S. M., Willett, W. C., Selhub, J., Hunter, D. J., Giovannucci, E. L., Holmes, M. D., Colditz, G. A., & Hankinson, S. E.
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2003-03-05
Volume
95
Issue
5
Pages
373-380
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2158523167
Cited by
354
References
2
FWCI
20.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.