The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complete and Specific Inhibition of Adult Lymphatic Regeneration by a Novel VEGFR-3 Neutralizing Antibody
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: New lymphatic growth may contribute to tumor metastasis. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 3 (VEGFR-3) by its ligands VEGF-C and -D is necessary for embryonic and tumor lymphangiogenesis. However, the exact role of VEGFR-3 signaling in adult lymphangiogenesis and in lymphatic vessel survival and regeneration is unclear. METHODS: A novel rat monoclonal antibody to murine VEGFR-3, mF4-31C1, which potently antagonizes the binding of VEGF-C to VEGFR-3, was developed. We tested the effects of systemic mF4-31C1 administration in a mouse tail skin model of lymphatic regeneration, either with or without local overexpression of VEGF-C, and we observed lymphatic and blood vessel regeneration over time using microlymphangiography and immunostaining. RESULTS: Normal mice regenerated complete and functional lymphatic vessels within 60 days of surgery. In athymic mice implanted with VEGF-C-overexpressing human breast carcinoma cells, lymphatic regeneration took place over 25 days and resulted in hyperplastic vessels. Under either condition, no lymphatic regeneration occurred in mice receiving mF4-31C1 during the regeneration period. Blood angiogenesis and preexisting lymphatic vessels were unaffected, both in morphology and in function. CONCLUSIONS: Blocking VEGFR-3 completely and specifically prevented both physiologically normal and tumor VEGF-C-enhanced lymphangiogenesis in the adult mouse but had no effect on either blood angiogenesis or the survival or function of existing lymphatic vessels. Thus, targeting VEGFR-3 with specific inhibitors may block new lymphatic growth exclusively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hoshida, T., Isaka, N., Hagendoorn, J., di Tomaso, E., Chen, Y.-L., Pytowski, B., Fukumura, D., Padera, T. P., & Jain, R. K. (2006) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-1392 · Cited by 361
Self-citationVEGFR-3 controls tip to stalk conversion at vessel fusion sites by reinforcing Notch signalling
Tammela, T., Zarkada, G., Nurmi, H., Jakobsson, L., Heinolainen, K., Tvorogov, D., Zheng, W., Franco, C. A., Murtomäki, A., Aranda, E., et al. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2331 · Cited by 321
Chen, X., Lin, X., Zhao, J., Shi, W., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Kan, B., Du, L., Wang, B., Wei, Y., et al. (2008) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2008.3 · Cited by 173
Three-dimensional biomimetic model to reconstitute sprouting lymphangiogenesis in vitro
Kim, S., Chung, M., & Jeon, N. L. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.019 · Cited by 157
Angiopoietin 2 regulates the transformation and integrity of lymphatic endothelial cell junctions
Zheng, W., Nurmi, H., Appak, S., Sabine, A., Bovay, E., Korhonen, E. A., Orsenigo, F., Lohela, M., D’Amico, G., Holopainen, T., et al. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.237677.114 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Pytowski, B., Goldman, J., Persaud, K., Wu, Y., Witte, L., Hicklin, D. J., Skobe, M., Boardman, K. C., & Swartz, M. A.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-04
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-21
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2151213460
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complete and Specific Inhibition of Adult Lymphatic Regeneration by a Novel VEGFR-3 Neutralizing Antibody. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/dji003
- The paper
- Pytowski, B., Goldman, J., Persaud, K., Wu, Y., Witte, L., Hicklin, D. J., Skobe, M., Boardman, K. C., & Swartz, M. A. (2005). Complete and Specific Inhibition of Adult Lymphatic Regeneration by a Novel VEGFR-3 Neutralizing Antibody. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.