The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Prolonged Storage of Whole Plasma or Isolated Plasma DNA on the Results of Circulating DNA Quantification Assays
Abstract
Analysis of molecular markers in biological fluids has been proposed as a tool for early detection and monitoring of cancer. Circulating plasma DNA concentrations have been found to be higher in cancer patients than in cancer-free control subjects, but little is known about the effect of specimen storage on plasma DNA concentrations. Here we investigated the impact of long-term storage of both plasma samples and purified plasma DNA on the reproducibility of plasma DNA quantification as determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis. The analysis was performed on samples from a subset of 34 lung cancer patients and 28 matched control subjects selected from 200 subjects in our previously published case-control study and from 117 cancer-free smokers enrolled in a lung cancer screening program. Two samples of plasma and isolated DNA were assessed for each patient, with a median of 41 months between the first and second assessments for participants in the case-control study and 9 months for participants in the screening study. DNA levels declined substantially between the two assessments at an average rate of approximately 30% per year. These data provide valuable information for the rational planning of retrospective studies of banked series of biological samples, particularly if collected over a long period of time, as can occur in large clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer—A survey
Fleischhacker, M., & Schmidt, B. (2007) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.10.001 · Cited by 851
Boeri, M., Verri, C., Conte, D., Roz, L., Modena, P., Facchinetti, F., Calabrò, E., Croce, C. M., Pastorino, U., & Sozzi, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1100048108 · Cited by 722
Self-citationThe emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management
Bronkhorst, A. J., Ungerer, V., & Holdenrieder, S. (2019) · Biomolecular Detection and Quantification · doi:10.1016/j.bdq.2019.100087 · Cited by 566
Circulating cell free DNA: Preanalytical considerations
El Messaoudi, S., Rolet, F., Mouliere, F., & Thierry, A. R. (2013) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.05.022 · Cited by 560
Pastorino, U., Rossi, M., Rosato, V., Marchianò, A., Sverzellati, N., Morosi, C., Fabbri, A., Galeone, C., Negri, E., Sozzi, G., et al. (2012) · European Journal of Cancer Prevention · doi:10.1097/cej.0b013e328351e1b6 · Cited by 414
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sozzi, G., Roz, L., Conte, D., Mariani, L., Andriani, F., Verderio, P., & Pastorino, U.
- Venue
- JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-12-21
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1848-1850
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2028744831
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Prolonged Storage of Whole Plasma or Isolated Plasma DNA on the Results of Circulating DNA Quantification Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/dji432
- The paper
- Sozzi, G., Roz, L., Conte, D., Mariani, L., Andriani, F., Verderio, P., & Pastorino, U. (2005). Effects of Prolonged Storage of Whole Plasma or Isolated Plasma DNA on the Results of Circulating DNA Quantification Assays. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji432
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.