Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meat Intake and Risk of Stomach and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Open access
González, Carlos A., Jakszyn, Paula, Pera, Guillem, Agudo, Antonio, Bingham, Sheila, Palli, Domenico, Ferrari, Pietro, Boeing, Heiner, del Giudice, Giuseppe, Plebani, Mario, Carneiro, Fátima, Nesi, Gabriella, Berrino, Franco, Sacerdote, Carlotta, Tumino, Rosario, Panico, Salvatore, Berglund, Göran, Simán, Henrik, Nyrén, Olof, Hallmans, Göran, Martinez, Carmen, Dorronsoro, Miren, Barricarte, Aurelio, Navarro, Carmen, Quirós, José R., Allen, Naomi, Key, Timothy J., Day, Nicholas E., Linseisen, Jakob, Nagel, Gabriele, Bergmann, Manuela M., Overvad, Kim, Jensen, Majken K., Tjonneland, Anne, Olsen, Anja, Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. Bas, Ocke, Marga, Peeters, Petra H. M., Numans, Mattijs E., Clavel-Chapelon, Françoise, Boutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine, Trichopoulou, Antonia, Psaltopoulou, Theodora, Roukos, Dimitrios, Lund, Eiliv, Hemon, Bertrand, Kaaks, Rudolf, Norat, Teresa, Riboli, Elio·2006·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary factors are thought to have an important role in gastric and esophageal carcinogenesis, but evidence from cohort studies for such a role is lacking. We examined the risks of gastric cancer and esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with meat consumption within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. METHODS: A total of 521,457 men and women aged 35-70 years in 10 European countries participated in the EPIC cohort. Dietary and lifestyle information was collected at recruitment. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine associations between meat intake and risks of cardia and gastric non-cardia cancers and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data from a calibration substudy were used to correct hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for diet measurement errors. In a nested case-control study, we examined interactions between Helicobacter pylori infection status (i.e., plasma H. pylori antibodies) and meat intakes. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 6.5 years, 330 gastric adenocarcinoma and 65 esophageal adenocarcinomas were diagnosed. Gastric non-cardia cancer risk was statistically significantly associated with intakes of total meat (calibrated HR per 100-g/day increase = 3.52; 95% CI = 1.96 to 6.34), red meat (calibrated HR per 50-g/day increase = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.88), and processed meat (calibrated HR per 50-g/day increase = 2.45; 95% CI = 1.43 to 4.21). The association between the risk of gastric non-cardia cancer and total meat intake was especially large in H. pylori-infected subjects (odds ratio per 100-g/day increase = 5.32; 95% CI = 2.10 to 13.4). Intakes of total, red, or processed meat were not associated with the risk of gastric cardia cancer. A positive but non-statistically significant association was observed between esophageal adenocarcinoma cancer risk and total and processed meat intake in the calibrated model. In this study population, the absolute risk of development of gastric adenocarcinoma within 10 years for a study subject aged 60 years was 0.26% for the lowest quartile of total meat intake and 0.33% for the highest quartile of total meat intake. CONCLUSION: Total, red, and processed meat intakes were associated with an increased risk of gastric non-cardia cancer, especially in H. pylori antibody-positive subjects, but not with cardia gastric cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djj071

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
González, C. A., Jakszyn, P., Pera, G., Agudo, A., Bingham, S., Palli, D., Ferrari, P., Boeing, H., del Giudice, G., Plebani, M., Carneiro, F., Nesi, G., Berrino, F., Sacerdote, C., Tumino, R., Panico, S., Berglund, G., Simán, H., Nyrén, O., Hallmans, G., Martinez, C., Dorronsoro, M., Barricarte, A., Navarro, C., Quirós, J. R., Allen, N., Key, T. J., Day, N. E., Linseisen, J., Nagel, G., Bergmann, M. M., Overvad, K., Jensen, M. K., Tjonneland, A., Olsen, A., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B., Ocke, M., Peeters, P. H. M., Numans, M. E., Clavel-Chapelon, F., Boutron-Ruault, M.-C., Trichopoulou, A., Psaltopoulou, T., Roukos, D., Lund, E., Hemon, B., Kaaks, R., Norat, T., & Riboli, E.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
98
Issue
5
Pages
345-354
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2160612502
Cited by
345
References
5
FWCI
24.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meat Intake and Risk of Stomach and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djj071
The paper
González, C. A., Jakszyn, P., Pera, G., Agudo, A., Bingham, S., Palli, D., Ferrari, P., Boeing, H., del Giudice, G., Plebani, M., Carneiro, F., Nesi, G., Berrino, F., Sacerdote, C., Tumino, R., Panico, S., Berglund, G., Simán, H., Nyrén, O., . . . Riboli, E. (2006). Meat Intake and Risk of Stomach and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djj071

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.