Cited by 237Neuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma CasesBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Prognostic Significance of Gene Expression Profiles of Metastatic Neuroblastomas Lacking MYCN Gene Amplification

Open access
Asgharzadeh, Shahab, Pique-Regi, Roger, Sposto, Richard, Wang, Hong, Yang, Yujun, Shimada, Hiroyuki, Matthay, Katherine, Buckley, Jonathan +2 more·2006·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aggressiveness of metastatic neuroblastomas that lack MYCN gene amplification varies with age--they are least aggressive when diagnosed in patients younger than 12 months and most aggressive when diagnosed in patients older than 24 months. However, age at diagnosis is not always associated with patient survival. We examined whether molecular classification of metastatic neuroblastomas without MYCN gene amplification at diagnosis using gene expression profiling could improve the prediction of risk of disease progression. METHODS: We used Affymetrix microarrays to determine the gene expression profiles of 102 untreated primary neuroblastomas without MYCN gene amplification obtained from children whose ages at diagnosis ranged from 0.1 to 151 months. A supervised method using diagonal linear discriminant analysis was devised to build a multigene model for predicting risk of disease progression. The accuracy of the model was evaluated using nested cross-validations, permutation analyses, and gene expression data from 15 additional tumors obtained at disease progression. RESULTS: An expression profile model using 55 genes defined a tumor signature that distinguished two groups of patients from among those older than 12 months at diagnosis and clinically classified as having high-risk disease, those with a progression-free survival (PFS) rate of 16% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8% to 28%), and those with a PFS rate of 79% (95% CI = 57% to 91%) (P<.01). These tumor signatures also identified two groups of patients with PFS of 15% (95% CI = 7% to 27%) and 69% (95% CI = 40% to 86%) (P<.01) from among patients who were older than 18 months at diagnosis. The gene expression signature of untreated molecular high-risk tumors was also present in progressively growing tumors. CONCLUSION: Gene expression signatures of tumors obtained at diagnosis from patients with clinically indistinguishable high-risk, metastatic neuroblastomas identify subgroups with different outcomes. Accurate identification of these subgroups with gene expression profiles may facilitate development, implementation, and analysis of clinical trials aimed at improving outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djj330

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prediction of high-risk neuroblastoma patient outcome has remained challenging.

    “However, while predictive models were highly accurate in risk assessment of current low- and intermediate-risk patients [18], the prediction of high-risk patient outcome has remained challenging [18–20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asgharzadeh, S., Pique-Regi, R., Sposto, R., Wang, H., Yang, Y., Shimada, H., Matthay, K., Buckley, J., Ortega, A., & Seeger, R. C.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Asgharzadeh, Shahab
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2006-09-06
Volume
98
Issue
17
Pages
1193-1203
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2095849686
Cited by
237
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Children's Cancer Research Fund
  • National Cancer Institute (T32 CA09659, CA 60104, T32CA009659)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
neuroblastoma, metastatic neuroblastoma, gene expression profiling, prognostic factors, disease progression prediction, progression-free survival, molecular classification, age at diagnosis, high-risk neuroblastoma, multi-gene signature, childhood cancer
MeSH terms
N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Gene Amplification, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Neuroblastoma, Nuclear Proteins, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Oncogene Proteins, Discriminant Analysis, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review