The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lymph Node Evaluation and Survival After Curative Resection of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adequate lymph node evaluation for cancer involvement is important for prognosis and treatment of patients with colon cancer. The number of lymph nodes evaluated may be a measure of quality in colon cancer care and appears to be inadequate in most patients treated for colon cancer. We performed a systematic review of the evidence for the association between lymph node evaluation and oncologic outcomes in patients with colon cancer. METHODS: Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse databases were searched from January 1, 1990, through June 30, 2006, for studies in which survival data as a function of number of lymph nodes evaluated were available. These studies were evaluated for methodologic quality, design, and data source. A total of 61,371 patients were included. RESULTS: Seventeen studies from nine countries were eligible for systematic review, including two secondary analyses of multicenter randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer, five population-based observational studies, and 10 single-institution retrospective cohort studies. Despite heterogeneity in methodology and differences in threshold numbers of lymph nodes evaluated (range = 6-40 lymph nodes), 16 of 17 studies reported that increased survival of patients with stage II colon cancer was associated with increased numbers of lymph nodes evaluated. Four of six studies with data from stage III patients also reported a positive association with survival among patients with stage III colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The number of lymph nodes evaluated after surgical resection was positively associated with survival of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer. These results support consideration of the number of lymph nodes evaluated as a measure of the quality of colon cancer care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Colon and Rectal Cancer
(1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450110090034 · Cited by 1,086
Cited by
Huang, Y.-Q., Liang, C.-H., He, L., Tian, J., Liang, C.-S., Chen, X., Ma, Z.-L., & Liu, Z.-Y. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.65.9128 · Cited by 1,765
Hohenberger, W., Weber, K., Matzel, K., Papadopoulos, T., & Merkel, S. (2009) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x · Cited by 1,636
Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update
Baxter, N. N., Kennedy, E. B., Bergsland, E., Berlin, J., George, T. J., Gill, S., Gold, P. J., Hantel, A., Jones, L., Lieu, C., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02538 · Cited by 367
Artinyan, A., Orcutt, S. T., Anaya, D. A., Richardson, P., Chen, G. J., & Berger, D. H. (2015) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000854 · Cited by 345
Impact of lymphadenectomy on the oncologic outcome of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma
Reibetanz, J., Jurowich, C., Erdogan, I., Nies, C., Rayes, N., Dralle, H., Behrend, M., Allolio, B., & Fassnacht, M. (2012) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3182367ac3 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, G. J., Rodriguez-Bigas, M. A., Skibber, J. M., & Moyer, V. A.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-20
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 433-441
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W1993965603
- Cited by
- 1,039
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lymph Node Evaluation and Survival After Curative Resection of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djk092
- The paper
- Chang, G. J., Rodriguez-Bigas, M. A., Skibber, J. M., & Moyer, V. A. (2007). Lymph Node Evaluation and Survival After Curative Resection of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.