Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,636

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome

Hohenberger, W., Weber, K., Matzel, K., Papadopoulos, T., Merkel, S.·2009·Colorectal Disease

Abstract

Objective Total mesorectal excision (TME) as proposed by R.J. Heald more than 20 years ago, is nowadays accepted worldwide for optimal rectal cancer surgery. This technique is focused on an intact package of the tumour and its main lymphatic drainage. This concept can be translated into colon cancer surgery, as the mesorectum is only part of the mesenteric planes which cover the colon and its lymphatic drainage like envelopes. According to the concept of TME for rectal cancer, we perform a concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colonic cancer. This technique aims at the separation of the mesocolic from the parietal plane and true central ligation of the supplying arteries and draining veins right at their roots. Method Prospectively obtained data from 1329 consecutive patients of our department with RO‐resection of colon cancer between 1978 and 2002 were analysed. Patient data of three subdivided time periods were compared. Results By consequent application of the procedure of CME, we were able to reduce local 5‐year recurrence rates in colon cancer from 6.5% in the period from 1978 to 1984 to 3.6% in 1995 to 2002. In the same period, the cancer related 5‐year survival rates in patients resected for cure increased from 82.1% to 89.1%. Conclusion The technique of CME in colon cancer surgery aims at a specimen with intact layers and a maximum of lymphnode harvest. This is translated into lower local recurrence rates and better overall survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 1,636

Metadata

Authors
Hohenberger, W., Weber, K., Matzel, K., Papadopoulos, T., & Merkel, S.
Venue
Colorectal Disease
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-09
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
354-364
ISSN
  • 1462-8910 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1318
OpenAlex
W1970054060
Cited by
1,636
References
27
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x
The paper
Hohenberger, W., Weber, K., Matzel, K., Papadopoulos, T., & Merkel, S. (2009). Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation – technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Disease. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.