The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection of Prostate Cancer via Biopsy in the Medicare-SEER Population During the PSA Era
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the considerable attention given to the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as a screening test for prostate cancer, it is needle biopsy--and not the PSA test result--that actually establishes the diagnosis of prostate cancer. We sought national estimates on the proportion of men found to have prostate cancer after a needle biopsy of the prostate and the risk of subsequent biopsies among those not found to have prostate cancer. METHODS: We linked Medicare claims data to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to analyze outcomes after 10,429 needle biopsies performed in 1993 through 2001 in 8273 men aged 65 years and older enrolled in Medicare Part B who resided in a SEER area. We determined the proportion of needle biopsies that were followed by a diagnosis of prostate cancer, the cumulative risk of prostate cancer following multiple biopsies, and the risk of subsequent biopsy among men not found to have prostate cancer in the previous biopsy. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The overall proportion of needle biopsies found to contain prostate cancer was 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 31% to 33%). The yield increased with age (26% for men aged 65-69 years, 31% for men aged 70-74 years, 35% for men aged 75-79 years, and 41% for men aged 80 years and older; P(trend)<.001). The cumulative risk of prostate cancer diagnosis increased with repeated biopsy, with 50% of men receiving a prostate cancer diagnosis after two biopsies, 62% after three biopsies, and 68% after four biopsies. Among men whose first recorded biopsy did not detect prostate cancer, the risk of having a subsequent biopsy was 11.6% (95% CI = 11% to 12%) at 1 year and 38% (95% CI = 36% to 40%) at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: About one-third of prostate biopsies identified prostate cancer in this population. Men not found to have prostate cancer on a first biopsy frequently undergo repeat biopsies, which raise the cumulative risk of prostate cancer diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare
Loeb, S., Carter, H. B., Berndt, S. I., Ricker, W., & Schaeffer, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.057 · Cited by 685
Wegelin, O., van Melick, H. H. E., Hooft, L., Bosch, J. L. H. R., Reitsma, H. B., Barentsz, J. O., & Somford, D. M. (2017) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041 · Cited by 425
Doyle, S., Feldman, M., Tomaszewski, J., & Madabhushi, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2010.2053540 · Cited by 253
Kim, H., Park, S., Jeong, I. G., Song, S. H., Jeong, Y., Kim, C.-S., & Lee, K. H. (2021) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c06946 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Welch, H. G., Fisher, E. S., Gottlieb, D. J., & Barry, M. J.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-11
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1395-1400
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2139915124
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Prostate Cancer via Biopsy in the Medicare-SEER Population During the PSA Era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djm119
- The paper
- Welch, H. G., Fisher, E. S., Gottlieb, D. J., & Barry, M. J. (2007). Detection of Prostate Cancer via Biopsy in the Medicare-SEER Population During the PSA Era. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.