The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prospective Study of Serum Vitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the United States
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D has been hypothesized to reduce cancer mortality through its effects on incidence and/or survival. Epidemiologic studies of the association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and the risk of cancer, however, have been largely limited to incident cancers at a few sites. METHODS: A total of 16,818 participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey who were 17 years or older at enrollment were followed from 1988-1994 through 2000. Levels of serum 25(OH)D were measured at baseline by radioimmunoassay. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to examine the relationship between serum 25(OH)D levels and total cancer mortality (in the entire population or according to race/ethnicity, sex, age, and retinol status) and mortality from specific cancers. Because serum was collected in the south in cooler months and the north in warmer months, we examined associations by collection season. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified 536 cancer deaths in 146,578 person-years. Total cancer mortality was unrelated to baseline vitamin D status in the entire population, men, women, non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, Mexican Americans, and in persons younger than 70 or 70 years or older. We found no interaction between vitamin D and season or vitamin D and serum retinol. Colorectal cancer mortality was inversely related to serum 25(OH)D level, with levels 80 nmol/L or higher associated with a 72% risk reduction (95% confidence interval = 32% to 89%) compared with lower than 50 nmol/L, P(trend) = .02. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support an association between 25(OH)D and total cancer mortality, although there was an inverse relationship between 25(OH)D levels and colorectal cancer mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vitamin D and Human Health: Lessons from Vitamin D Receptor Null Mice
Bouillon, R., Carmeliet, G., Verlinden, L., van Etten, E., Verstuyf, A., Luderer, H. F., Lieben, L., Mathieu, C., & Demay, M. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0004 · Cited by 1,783
Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial
Lappe, J. M., Travers-Gustafson, D., Davies, K. M., Recker, R. R., & Heaney, R. P. (2007) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.6.1586 · Cited by 1,446
Sunlight and Vitamin D: A global perspective for health
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. F. (2013) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.24494 · Cited by 1,156
Vitamin D-effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5010111 · Cited by 733
Vitamin D for Cancer Prevention: Global Perspective
Garland, C. F., Gorham, E. D., Mohr, S. B., & Garland, F. C. (2009) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.021 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Freedman, D. M., Looker, A. C., Chang, S.-C., & Graubard, B. I.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-10-30
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1594-1602
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2130585127
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Study of Serum Vitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djm204
- The paper
- Freedman, D. M., Looker, A. C., Chang, S.-C., & Graubard, B. I. (2007). Prospective Study of Serum Vitamin D and Cancer Mortality in the United States. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djm204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.