Cited by 90Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningHealthcare cost, quality, practicesLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Conceptualizing overdiagnosis in cancer screening

Open access
Marcus, P. M., Prorok, P. C., Miller, A. B., DeVoto, E. J., Kramer, B. S.·2015·JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

The aim of cancer screening is to detect asymptomatic cancers whose treatment will result in extension of life, relative to length of life absent screening. Unfortunately, cancer screening also results in overdiagnosis, the detection of cancers that, in the absence of screening, would not present symptomatically during one's lifetime. Thus, their detection and subsequent treatment is unnecessary and detrimental. This definition of overdiagnosis, while succinct, does not capture the ways it can occur, and our interactions with patients, advocates, researchers, clinicians, and journalists have led us to believe that the concept of overdiagnosis is difficult to explain and, for some, difficult to accept. We propose a dichotomy, the "tumor-patient" classification, to aid in understanding overdiagnosis. The tumor category includes asymptomatic malignant disease that would regress spontaneously if left alone, as well as asymptomatic malignant disease that stagnates or progresses too slowly to be life threatening in even the longest of lifetimes. The patient category includes asymptomatic malignant disease that would progress quickly enough to be life threatening during a lifetime of typical length, but lacks clinical relevance because death due to another cause intercedes prior to what would have been the date of symptomatic diagnosis had screening not occurred. Cancer screening of most organs is likely to result in overdiagnosis of both types. However, the ratio of tumor- to patient-driven overdiagnosis almost certainly varies, and may vary drastically, by organ, screening modality, patient characteristics, and other factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djv014

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Levy IG, Dougherty GE, Hill GB, Woods WG, Bernstein ML. Neuroblastoma. In: KramerBS, GohaganJK, ProrokPC, eds. Cancer screening: theory and practice. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1999:409-429.
  2. Schroder FH. Prostate cancer. In: KramerBS, GohaganJK, ProrokPC, eds. Can- cer screening: theory and practice. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker; 1999:461-514.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcus, P. M., Prorok, P. C., Miller, A. B., DeVoto, E. J., & Kramer, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2015-02-06
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
djv014-djv014
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2110164439
Cited by
90
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
overdiagnosis, cancer screening, asymptomatic cancer, spontaneous tumor regression, tumor progression, life expectancy, screening harms
MeSH terms
Cause of Death, Concept Formation, Humans, Infant, Life Expectancy, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Mass Screening, Neoplasms, Neuroblastoma, Prostatic Neoplasms, Remission, Spontaneous, Time Factors, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Unnecessary Procedures, Early Detection of Cancer, Watchful Waiting, Asymptomatic Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review