Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 682

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial

Open access
Ruers, Theo, Van Coevorden, Frits, Punt, Cornelis J. A., Pierie, Jean-Pierre E. N., Borel-Rinkes, Inne, Ledermann, Jonathan A., Poston, Graeme, Bechstein, Wolf, Lentz, Marie-Ange, Mauer, Murielle, Folprecht, Gunnar, Van Cutsem, Eric, Ducreux, Michel, Nordlinger, Bernard·2017·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

Background: Tumor ablation is often employed for unresectable colorectal liver metastases. However, no survival benefit has ever been demonstrated in prospective randomized studies. Here, we investigate the long-term benefits of such an aggressive approach. Methods: In this randomized phase II trial, 119 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (n < 10 and no extrahepatic disease) received systemic treatment alone or systemic treatment plus aggressive local treatment by radiofrequency ablation ± resection. Previously, we reported that the primary end point (30-month overall survival [OS] > 38%) was met. We now report on long-term OS results. All statistical tests were two-sided. The analyses were according to intention to treat. Results: At a median follow up of 9.7 years, 92 of 119 (77.3%) patients had died: 39 of 60 (65.0%) in the combined modality arm and 53 of 59 (89.8%) in the systemic treatment arm. Almost all patients died of progressive disease (35 patients in the combined modality arm, 49 patients in the systemic treatment arm). There was a statistically significant difference in OS in favor of the combined modality arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.88, P = .01). Three-, five-, and eight-year OS were 56.9% (95% CI = 43.3% to 68.5%), 43.1% (95% CI = 30.3% to 55.3%), 35.9% (95% CI = 23.8% to 48.2%), respectively, in the combined modality arm and 55.2% (95% CI = 41.6% to 66.9%), 30.3% (95% CI = 19.0% to 42.4%), 8.9% (95% CI = 3.3% to 18.1%), respectively, in the systemic treatment arm. Median OS was 45.6 months (95% CI = 30.3 to 67.8 months) in the combined modality arm vs 40.5 months (95% CI = 27.5 to 47.7 months) in the systemic treatment arm. Conclusions: This phase II trial is the first randomized study demonstrating that aggressive local treatment can prolong OS in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djx015

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 682

Metadata

Authors
Ruers, T., Van Coevorden, F., Punt, C. J. A., Pierie, J.-P. E. N., Borel-Rinkes, I., Ledermann, J. A., Poston, G., Bechstein, W., Lentz, M.-A., Mauer, M., Folprecht, G., Van Cutsem, E., Ducreux, M., & Nordlinger, B.
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2017-03-17
Volume
109
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2105
OpenAlex
W2596956169
Cited by
682
References
4
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/djx015
The paper
Ruers, T., Van Coevorden, F., Punt, C. J. A., Pierie, J.-P. E. N., Borel-Rinkes, I., Ledermann, J. A., Poston, G., Bechstein, W., Lentz, M.-A., Mauer, M., Folprecht, G., Van Cutsem, E., Ducreux, M., & Nordlinger, B. (2017). Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.