Cited by 1,092Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Updated Overall Survival and Molecular Subgroup Analyses of the Open-Label, Phase 3 TRIBE Study

Open access
Cremolini, Chiara, Loupakis, Fotios, Antoniotti, Carlotta, Lupi, Cristiana, Sensi, Elisa, Lonardi, Sara, Mezi, Silvia, Tomasello, Gianluca +12 more·2015·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background In the TRIBE study, FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compared with FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab. In this updated analysis, we aimed to provide mature results for overall survival-a secondary endpoint-and report treatment efficacy in RAS and BRAF molecular subgroups.Methods TRIBE was an open-label, multicentre, phase 3 randomised study of patients (aged 18-70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 2 or less and aged 71-75 years with an ECOG performance status of 0) with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who were recruited from 34 Italian oncology units. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based procedure to receive FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Bevacizumab was given as a 5 mg/kg intravenous dose. FOLFIRI consisted of a 180 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion of irinotecan for 60 min followed by a 200 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion of leucovorin for 120 min, a 400 mg/m(2) intravenous bolus of fluorouracil, and a 2400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 46 h. FOLFOXIRI consisted of a 165 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion of irinotecan for 60 min, followed by an 85 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin given concurrently with 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin for 120 min, followed by a 3200 mg/m(2) continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 48 h. Tissue samples for RAS and BRAF mutational status analyses were centrally collected. In this updated analysis, we assessed the secondary endpoint of overall survival in the main cohort and treatment efficacy in RAS and BRAF molecular subgroups. All analyses were by intention to treat. TRIBE was concluded on Nov 30, 2014. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00719797.Findings Between July 17, 2008, and May 31, 2011, 508 patients were randomly assigned. At a median follow-up of 48·1 months (IQR 41·7-55·6), median overall survival was 29·8 months (95% CI 26·0-34·3) in the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab group compared with 25·8 months (22·5-29·1) in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·65-0·98; p=0·03). Median overall survival was 37·1 months (95% CI 29·7-42·7) in the RAS and BRAF wild-type subgroup compared with 25·6 months (22·4-28·6) in the RAS-mutation-positive subgroup (HR 1·49, 95% CI 1·11-1·99) and 13·4 months (8·2-24·1) in the BRAF-mutation-positive subgroup (HR 2·79, 95% CI 1·75-4·46; likelihood-ratio test p<0·0001). Treatment effect was not significantly different across molecular subgroups (pinteraction=0·52).Interpretation FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is a feasible treatment option for those patients who meet the inclusion criteria of the present study, irrespective of baseline clinical characteristics and RAS or BRAF mutational status.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00122-9

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chemotherapy regimens FOLFOX and FOLFIRI offer modest improvements in survival outcomes for metastatic colorectal cancer.

    “Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan), that have long been the cornerstone of mCRC treatment, offer modest improvements in survival outcomes [6,7].”
  • In the TRIBE trial, triplet plus bevacizumab contributed to survival and was effective regardless of RAS mutation status.

    “In the TRIBE trial comparing the effectiveness of triplet plus bevacizumab treatment and doublet plus bevacizumab treatment, its contribution to survival was demonstrated, and it was shown to be effective regardless of RAS mutation status [20].”
  • In the TRIBE trial, survival time of RAS mutant patients was poorer than RAS-BRAF wild patients but better than BRAF mutant patients.

    “In this study, the survival time of RAS mutant patients was poorer than that of RAS-BRAF wild patients but was better than that of BRAF mutant patients.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [2]2. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (13): 1306-15.
  2. [5]5. Hurwitz HI, Tan BR, Reeves JA, et al. Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequential or Concurrent FOLFOXIRI-Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX-Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (STEAM). Oncologist 2019; 24 (7): 921-32.
  3. [7]7. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2016; 27 (8): 1386-422.
  4. [9]9. Matsuoka A, Maeda O, Ando Y. FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (3): 291.
  5. [10]10. Simkens LH, van Tinteren H, May A, et al. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet 2015; 385 (9980): 1843-52.
  6. [11]11. Koeberle D, Betticher DC, von Moos R, et al. Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06). Ann Oncol 2015; 26 (4): 709-14.
  7. [12]12. Hegewisch-Becker S, Graeven U, Lerchenmuller CA, et al. Maintenance strategies after firstline oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (AIO 0207): a randomised, non-inferiority, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (13): 135569.
  8. [13]13. Stein A, Schwenke C, Folprecht G, Arnold D. Effect of Application and Intensity of Bevacizumabbased Maintenance After Induction Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2016; 15 (2): e29-39.
  9. [14]14. Masi G, Salvatore L, Boni L, et al. Continuation or reintroduction of bevacizumab beyond progression to first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: final results of the randomized BEBYP trial. Ann Oncol 2015; 26 (4): 724-30.
  10. [15]15. Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D, et al. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14 (1): 29-37.
  11. [16]16. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45 (2): 228-47.
  12. [18]18. Sehgal R, Sheahan K, O'Connell PR, Hanly AM, Martin ST, Winter DC. Lynch syndrome: an updated review. Genes (Basel) 2014; 5 (3): 497-507.
  13. [19]19. Buza N, Ziai J, Hui P. Mismatch repair deficiency testing in clinical practice. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2016; 16 (5): 591-604.
  14. [20]20. Provenzale D, Gupta S, Ahnen DJ, et al. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016; 14 (8): 1010-30.
  15. [23]23. Stintzing S, Modest DP, Rossius L, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (10): 1426-34.
  16. [24]24. Rivera F, Karthaus M, Hecht JR, et al. Final analysis of the randomised PEAK trial: overall survival and tumour responses during first-line treatment with mFOLFOX6 plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017; 32 (8): 117990.
  17. [25]25. Innocenti F, Ou FS, Qu X, et al. Mutational Analysis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 Identifies New Roles of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden for Patient Outcome. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37 (14): 1217-27.
  18. [27]27. Stein A, Atanackovic D, Hildebrandt B, et al. Upfront FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab followed by fluoropyrimidin and bevacizumab maintenance in patients with molecularly unselected metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2015; 113 (6): 872-7.
  19. [28]28. Oki E, Kato T, Bando H, et al. A Multicenter Clinical Phase II Study of FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: QUATTRO Study. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2018; 17 (2): 147-55.
  20. [29]29. Satake H, Sunakawa Y, Miyamoto Y, et al. A phase II trial of 1st-line modified-FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer harboring RAS mutation: JACCRO CC-11. Oncotarget 2018; 9 (27): 18811-20.
  21. [30]30. Cremolini C, Marmorino F, Bergamo F, et al. Phase II randomised study of maintenance treatment with bevacizumab or bevacizumab plus metronomic chemotherapy after first-line induction with FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients: the MOMA trial. Eur J Cancer 2019; 109 : 175-82.
  22. [31]31. de Gramont A, Buyse M, Abrahantes JC, et al. Reintroduction of oxaliplatin is associated with improved survival in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25 (22): 3224-9.
  23. [32]32. Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, et al. Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27 (34): 5727-3
  24. [34]34. Cremolini C, Antoniotti C, Lonardi S, et al. Activity and Safety of Cetuximab Plus Modified FOLFOXIRI Followed by Maintenance With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab for RAS and BRAF Wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4 (4): 529-36.
  25. [36]36. Borelli B, Moretto R, Lonardi S, et al. TRIPLETE: a randomised phase III study of modified FOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus panitumumab as initial therapy for patients with unresectable RAS and BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. ESMO Open 2018; 3 (4): e000403.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cremolini, C., Loupakis, F., Antoniotti, C., Lupi, C., Sensi, E., Lonardi, S., Mezi, S., Tomasello, G., Ronzoni, M., Zaniboni, A., Tonini, G., Carlomagno, C., Allegrini, G., Chiara, S., D'Amico, M., Granetto, C., Cazzaniga, M., Boni, L., Fontanini, G., & Falcone, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT)
  • Policlinico Umberto I (IT)
  • Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona (IT)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero (IT)
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
Corresponding author
Falcone, Alfredo
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
16
Issue
13
Pages
1306-1315
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129998117
Cited by
1,092
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 9
FWCI
35.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, FOLFOXIRI, FOLFIRI, bevacizumab, first-line chemotherapy, overall survival, RAS mutation status, BRAF mutation status, molecular subtypes, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, progression-free survival, treatment efficacy, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Camptothecin, Leucovorin, DNA Mutational Analysis, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Fluorouracil, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Metastasis, Organoplatinum Compounds, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Time Factors, Colorectal Neoplasms, Proportional Hazards Models, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Treatment Outcome, Disease-Free Survival, ras Proteins, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Intention to Treat Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review