Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smoking Cessation Pharmacotherapy, Even Without Counseling, Remains a Cornerstone of Treatment

Tindle, Hilary A, Greevy, Robert A·2018·JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal, Leas and colleagues report results from a prospective observational study of smokers making a quit attempt that concludes, “…the simple provision of pharmaceutical aids to smokers does not appear to be an effective way to increase the proportion who successfully quit for the long term” (1). Despite the rigorous methodological aspects of this study, we believe this conclusion is overstated for three main reasons: the conflicting body of evidence from large effectiveness randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which do not suffer from confounding; residual confounding, particularly by smoker type; and recall bias tending to under capture failed quit attempts that did not involve pharmacotherapy. While this study could bring useful attention to the benefits of counseling, it would be harmful if it discouraged cessation medication use when counseling was unavailable. The investigators analyzed data from the nationally representative Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Study (CPS-TUS) overlap sample featuring two surveys administered to the same individuals one year apart (2002–2003 and 2010–2011). Respondents who were smoking every day or some days at the time of the first survey, and who indicated at follow-up that they had made a quit attempt during the past 12 months, were asked about use of any US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved smoking cessation medications to support the quit attempt. Those who self-reported abstinence for…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnci/djx246

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Leas, 2017, Effectiveness of pharmaceutical smoking cessation aids in a nationally representative cohort of American smokers, J Natl Cancer Inst, 110, 581, 10.1093/jnci/djx240 · DOI
  2. Anthenelli, 2016, Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial, Lancet., 387, 2507, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Fiore, 2008, Clinical Practice Guidelines. Rockville, 107
  4. Shiffman, 2008, Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States, Am J Prev Med., 34, 102, 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.033 · DOI
  5. Caraballo, 2017, Quit methods used by US adult cigarette smokers, 2014-2016, Prev Chronic Dis., 14, E32, 10.5888/pcd14.160600 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cunningham, 2016, Effect of mailing nicotine patches on tobacco cessation among adult smokers:, A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med., 176, 184, 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7792 · DOI
  7. Kasza, 2013, Effectiveness of stop-smoking medications: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey, Addiction., 108, 193, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04009.x · DOI
  8. West, 2007, Is nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation effective in the “real world”? Findings from a prospective multinational cohort study, Thorax., 62, 998, 10.1136/thx.2007.078758 · DOI
  9. Gilpin, 2006, Population effectiveness of pharmaceutical aids for smoking cessation: What is associated with increased success?, Nicotine Tob Res., 8, 661, 10.1080/14622200600910801 · DOI
  10. Kotz, 2014, Prospective cohort study of the effectiveness of varenicline versus nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in the “real world.”, BMC Public Health., 14, 1163, 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1163 · DOI
  11. Alpert, 2013, A prospective cohort study challenging the effectiveness of population-based medical intervention for smoking cessation, Tob Control., 22, 32, 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050129 · DOI
  12. Hughes, 2012, Effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy—a rebuttal, Addiction., 107, 1527, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03925.x · DOI
  13. Shiffman, 2009, Light and intermittent smokers: Background and perspective, Nicotine Tob Res., 11, 122, 10.1093/ntr/ntn020 · DOI
  14. Shiffman, 2012, Characteristics and smoking patterns of intermittent smokers, Exp Clin Psychopharmacol., 20, 264, 10.1037/a0027546 · DOI
  15. Tindle, 2011, Smoking cessation behavior among intermittent smokers versus daily smokers, Am J Public Health., 101, e1, 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300186 · DOI
  16. Shiffman, 2007, Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation in the “real world.”, Thorax., 62, 930, 10.1136/thx.2007.081919 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tindle, H. A., & Greevy, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
  • Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
Venue
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2017-12-21
Volume
110
Issue
6
Pages
545-546
ISSN
  • 0027-8874
  • 1460-2105
Cited by
15
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review