The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of the Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Open accessAbstract
Individual patient data were available for all four of the randomized trials that began before 1995, and that compared adjuvant radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy following breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). A total of 3729 women were eligible for analysis. Radiotherapy reduced the absolute 10-year risk of any ipsilateral breast event (ie, either recurrent DCIS or invasive cancer) by 15.2% (SE 1.6%, 12.9% vs 28.1% 2 P <.00001), and it was effective regardless of the age at diagnosis, extent of breast-conserving surgery, use of tamoxifen, method of DCIS detection, margin status, focality, grade, comedonecrosis, architecture, or tumor size. The proportional reduction in ipsilateral breast events was greater in older than in younger women (2P < .0004 for difference between proportional reductions; 10-year absolute risks: 18.5% vs 29.1% at ages <50 years, 10.8% vs 27.8% at ages ≥ 50 years) but did not differ significantly according to any other available factor. Even for women with negative margins and small low-grade tumors, the absolute reduction in the 10-year risk of ipsilateral breast events was 18.0% (SE 5.5, 12.1% vs 30.1%, 2P = .002). After 10 years of follow-up, there was, however, no significant effect on breast cancer mortality, mortality from causes other than breast cancer, or all-cause mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Loibl, S., Poortmans, P., Morrow, M., Denkert, C., & Curigliano, G. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32381-3 · Cited by 1,648
Biganzoli, L., Wildiers, H., Oakman, C., Marotti, L., Loibl, S., Kunkler, I., Reed, M., Ciatto, S., Voogd, A. C., Brain, E., et al. (2012) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70383-7 · Cited by 567
Cuzick, J., Sestak, I., Pinder, S. E., Ellis, I. O., Forsyth, S., Bundred, N. J., Forbes, J. F., Bishop, H., Fentiman, I. S., & George, W. D. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70266-7 · Cited by 567
Morrow, M., Van Zee, K. J., Solin, L. J., Houssami, N., Chavez-MacGregor, M., Harris, J. R., Horton, J., Hwang, S., Johnson, P. L., Marinovich, M. L., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2016.68.3573 · Cited by 386
Tosh, G., Soares-Weiser, K., & Adams, C. E. (2011) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2011.13.2/gtosh · Cited by 84
Metadata
- Authors
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG)
- Venue
- JNCI Monographs
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-01
- Volume
- 2010
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 162-177
- ISSN
- 1052-6773 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6614
- OpenAlex
- W2153065589
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of the Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq039
- The paper
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). (2010). Overview of the Randomized Trials of Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast. JNCI Monographs. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.