Cited by 50MicroRNA in disease regulationNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

MicroRNA expression patterns in human astrocytes in relation to anatomical location and age.

Rao, Vijayaraghava T.S., Ludwin, Samuel K., Fuh, Shih-Chieh, Sawaya, Robin, Moore, Craig S., Ho, Ming-Kai, Bedell, Barry J., Sarnat, Harvey B. +2 more·2016·Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Anatomic distribution and age are variables linked to functions of astrocytes under physiologic and pathologic conditions. We measured the relative expression of a panel of microRNAs (miRNAs) in astrocytes captured by laser micro-dissection from normal human adult white and grey matter, human fetal white matter and germinal matrix samples. Although expression of most miRNAs was comparable between adult and fetal samples, regional differences were observed. In the adult cerebral cortex, expression of miRNAs in morphologically distinct inter-laminar astrocytes underlying the glial limitans differed from those in deeper cortical layers, suggesting functional specialization possibly related to structural stability and defense from potentially harmful factors in the cerebrospinal fluid. Differences between adult white and grey matter miRNA expression included higher expression of pro-inflammatory miRNAs in the former, potentially contributing to differences in inflammation between grey and white matter plaques in multiple sclerosis. Lower expression of miRNAs in fetal versus adult white matter astrocytes likely reflects the immaturity of these migrating cells. Highly expressed miRNAs in the fetal germinal matrix are probably relevant in development and also recapitulate some responses to injury. Future studies can address regional alterations of miRNA expression in pathological conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnen/nlv016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The low expression of miR-34a in ILAs is probably linked to their stability, and the low expression of miR-449 is linked to their typical architecture.

    “For instance, the low expression of miR-34a (which induces astrogliogenesis) is probably linked to the stability of ILA; while the low expression of miR-449 (a regulator of microtubule dynamics in cell proliferation) is linked to their typical architecture.”
  • ILAs show an abundance of anti-inflammatory miRNA (such as miR-146, with limited expression of pro-inflammatory miR-338 and miR-365) and modulators of GFAP expression (such as miR-125b), supporting the hypothesis of ILAs as a "first-line defense" against external insults.

    “On the contrary, there was an abundance of anti-inflammatory miRNA (as miR-146, which coincides with the limited expression of pro-inflammatory miR-338 and miR-365) and modulators of GFAP expression (as miR-125b), supporting the hypothesis of ILA as a “first-line defense” against external insults (Rao et al., 2016).”
  • ILAs show low or undetectable expression of miRNA-regulating genes linked to cell proliferation, development, migration, angiogenesis, and pro-inflammatory processes.

    “There was a low or undetectable expression of miRNA-regulating genes linked to cell proliferation, development, migration, angiogenesis, and pro-inflammatory processes, suggesting high stability of these cells, which do not appear deeply involved in metabolic homeostasis.”
  • ILAs have an expression profile distinct from other astrocytes, indicating more specific and restrictive roles.

    “This analysis revealed that ILAs have an expression profile distinct from other astrocytes, indicating more specific and restrictive roles.”
  • ILAs have a unique microRNA expression profile compared to protoplasmic and fibrous astrocytes.

    “ILAs were found to have a unique miRNA profile compared to the protoplasmic and fibrous astrocytes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rao, V. T. S., Ludwin, S. K., Fuh, S.-C., Sawaya, R., Moore, C. S., Ho, M.-K., Bedell, B. J., Sarnat, H. B., Bar-Or, A., & Antel, J. P.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Published
2016-01-22
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
156-166
ISSN
  • 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6578
OpenAlex
W2255875670
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
microRNA expression, astrocytes, cerebral cortex, white matter, grey matter, germinal matrix, fetal brain, age-related changes, multiple sclerosis, neuroinflammation, astrocyte migration, brain development
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aging, Astrocytes, Female, Fetus, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Inflammation, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Young Adult, White Matter, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review