The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Processes of Adopting Multimedia and Interactivity in Three Online Newsrooms
Abstract
This article examines the material culture of newsroom practices by focusing on the dynamics of the processes through which news workers adopt new technologies. More specifically, it looks at some key factors that shape the adoption of multimedia and interactive technologies in online newspapers. Through ethnographic case studies of innovations in 3 online newsrooms, I show that variations in organizational structures, work practices, and representations of the users are related to different ways in which members of the newsroom appropriate these technologies. I draw from this analysis to reflect on issues related to the technological dimension of editorial work and the dynamics of media convergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Cited by
If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics
Bucher, T. (2018) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001 · Cited by 1,223
Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416521003654160 · Cited by 733
Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms
Kleis Nielsen, R., & Ganter, S. A. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817701318 · Cited by 522
Enter the Robot Journalist: Users' perceptions of automated content
Clerwall, C. (2014) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.883116 · Cited by 377
Metadata
- Authors
- Boczkowski, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-213
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2466
- OpenAlex
- W2168920577
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
