What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing
Abstract
Over the past two decades, organizational scholars have increasingly argued that technology’s affects on organizations are socially constructed. Constructivists who study implementation generally hold that organizational change emerges from an ongoing stream of social action in which people respond to a technology’s constraints and affordances, as well as to each other. Although most students of technology and organizing generally agree on the ontology of constructivism, there are considerable differences in what scholars mean when they say that a technology’s affects are socially constructed. We show that research on the social construction of implementation clusters into five coherent perspectives, which we call perception, interpretation, appropriation,enactment, and alignment. The perspectives differ with regard to the social phenomena they study and the processes by which they claim that construction occurs. The perspectives also focus on different phases of the implementation process and operate at different levels of analysis. After elucidating each perspective, we argue that students of technology and organizing could more directly engage issues central to organizational theory if they grappled with materiality and power, which they have heretofore downplayed in an attempt to counteract the field’s earlier tendency toward technological determinism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals' understandings about a given technology vary across local meaning systems.
“In particular, focusing on situated configurations emphasizes that individuals' understandings about a given technology vary across local meaning systems (Leonardi and Barley 2010, Mol 2003, Pinch and Bijker 1987).”
From To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis (2022) · cites this paper as Leonardi and Barley 2010
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733 · see citing works
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760 · see citing works
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571 · see citing works
Barley, S. R. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392767 · Cited by 2,315 · see citing works
Self-citationTechnological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/196734.196745 · Cited by 1,736 · see citing works
Disrupted Routines: Team Learning and New Technology Implementation in Hospitals
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094828 · Cited by 1,729 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automation, Algorithms, and Beyond: Why Work Design Matters More Than Ever in a Digital World
Parker, S. K., & Grote, G. (2022) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12241 · Cited by 960 · see citing works
Lebovitz, S., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Levina, N. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1549 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion
Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170050 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., & Yoo, Y. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.3.10 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
The Making of Data Commodities: Data Analytics as an Embedded Process
Aaltonen, A., Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2021) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1912928 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Technological capacity in the public sector: the case of Estonia
Lember, V., Kattel, R., & Tõnurist, P. (2018) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/0020852317735164 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Anthony, C. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0334 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Developing human resource data risk management in the age of big data
Calvard, T. S., & Jeske, D. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.011 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Lehoux, P., Miller, F. A., Daudelin, G., & Denis, J.-L. (2017) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.11 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Macrae, C. (2022) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.13850 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Greenhalgh, T., Fahy, N., & Shaw, S. (2017) · International Journal of Health Policy and Management · doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.65 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Leonardi, P. M. (2025) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2025.100582 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationHow venture capitalists decide which new medical technologies come to exist
Lehoux, P., Miller, F. A., Daudelin, G., & Urbach, D. R. (2016) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scv051 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The Crush the Crave Quit Smoking App and Young Adult Smokers: Qualitative Case Study of Affordances
Struik, L. L., Bottorff, J. L., Baskerville, N. B., & Oliffe, J. L. (2018) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.9489 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Annals
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-51
- ISSN
- 1941-6067 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6520
- OpenAlex
- W2154824354
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 104.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Annals (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- social construction of technology, organizational change, implementation, constructivism, materiality, power, technological determinism, affordances, appropriations, enactment, alignment, perception, interpretation, levels of analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
