The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beneath the Veneer of Fragmentation: Television Audience Polarization in a Multichannel World
Abstract
This study reviews the history of television audience fragmentation in the United States and uses a secondary analysis of Nielsen peoplemeter data to assess the current state of both fragmentation and audience polarization across 62 of the most prominent television networks. Audience fragmentation is more advanced than is generally recognized. Polarization, the tendency of channel audiences to be composed of devotees and nonviewers, is also evident, though modest. Contrary to the “law of double jeopardy,” there are now many examples of both small-but-loyal and small-but-disloyal audiences. Loyalty and audience fragmentation affect network profitability and have social consequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore
Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096460 · Cited by 2,418
(2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203877111 · Cited by 1,667
Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?
Holt, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209523 · Cited by 1,319
(2001) · Cited by 783
Selective Exposure To Communication
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203056721 · Cited by 780
Media performance: mass communication and the public interest
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-1900 · Cited by 703
Growing Up with Television: Cultivation Processes
(2009) · Media Effects · doi:10.4324/9780203877111-9 · Cited by 674
Media gratifications research : current perspectives
Rosengren, K. E., Wenner, L. A., & Palmgreen, P. (1985) · Cited by 558
Mediated politics : communication in the future of democracy
Bennett, W. L., & Entman, R. M. (2000) · Cited by 383
Deconstructing the Diversity Principle
Napoli, P. M. (1999) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02815.x · Cited by 370
Cited by
Media and Political Polarization
Prior, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 · Cited by 1,125
The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media
Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2018.1428656 · Cited by 1,055
Ideological Segregation Online and Offline *
Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr044 · Cited by 980
Balmas, M. (2014) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650212453600 · Cited by 325
Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires
Taneja, H., Webster, J. G., Malthouse, E. C., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444811436146 · Cited by 317
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, J. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 366-382
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2466
- OpenAlex
- W2110471449
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 12.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beneath the Veneer of Fragmentation: Television Audience Polarization in a Multichannel World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/joc/55.2.366
- The paper
- Webster, J. G. (2005). Beneath the Veneer of Fragmentation: Television Audience Polarization in a Multichannel World. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/55.2.366
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.